ArticleJAMA oncology2025
Oncological Safety of MRI-Informed Biopsy Decision-Making in Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- PRECISE Assessment of Sequential Biparametric MRI and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naive Men: A Retrospective Cohort Study.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence studies for prostate cancer detection on MRI.European radiology · 2026Article
- Response to correspondence regarding "The value of micro-ultrasound for prostate cancer screening: a retrospective real-world feasibility study".Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Evaluating the biopsy-negative prostate lesions based on sequential biparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging: Can PRECISE be used to guide repeat biopsy?Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Association of PI-RADS Score with Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer and Histopathological Upgrading in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of central review and MRI image quality on prostate cancer diagnosis and biopsy decision-making in referred patients.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Location- and ADC-based stratification of transition zone PI-RADS 3 lesions to optimize biopsy indication.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- [Reducing overdiagnosis-how to do I correctly assess the indication for prostate biopsy?]Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- AI decision support for increasing prostate biopsy efficiency: a retrospective multicentre, multiscanner study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Polygenic risk scores for premagnetic resonance imaging risk stratification in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- The evolving PI-RADS paradigm.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Review
- Imaging-based clinical decision tree enables risk stratification of extraprostatic extension before radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1 as a predictor of clinically significant and aggressive prostate cancer: a radical prostatectomy-validated study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) perspectives on the role of prostate MRI in active surveillance.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Integrated Urinary and Tissue Proteomic Signatures Reveal Core and Progression Biomarkers in MRI-Visible and MRI-Non-Visible Prostate Cancer.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Transition from Transrectal Systematic to Transperineal Lesion-Focused Prostate Biopsy: A Real-World Comparative Analysis.Cancers · 2026Article
- Article
- Association Between Prostate Cancer Detection Rate and Year of Prostate Biopsy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byBeyond the2025
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pathway for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2) uses multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for prostate biopsy (PB) decision-making. However, the intermediate impact on patient outcomes in men with negative MRI results avoiding PB and men with positive MRI results without PCa remains unknown. Objective: To assess the feasibility and safety of a community-based MRI diagnostic strategy in men with suspected PCa using 3-year active monitoring. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multisite, longitudinal cohort trial took place across 54 community-based urology practices and 2 radiology imaging centers at a referral academic institution in Berlin, Germany. Eligible participants aged 18 to 75 years with clinically suspected PCa were enrolled between September 2016 and December 2017 and monitored for 3 years. Final analysis was reported on December 23, 2023. Exposures: Participants underwent 3-T mpMRI. Men with findings suspected to be PCa were recommended for targeted PB (diagnostic phase). Men with negative mpMRI results or positive mpMRI results with benign findings at PB were systematically monitored for 3 years (monitoring phase). Clinical visits were recommended every 6 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The total proportion of men avoiding PB and those with csPCa. Results: A total of 593 men (median [IQR] age, 64 [58-70] years) underwent mpMRI, with 286 (48%) having negative MRI results, 261 (44%) avoiding PB initially, and 242 (41%) avoiding PB over 3 years. csPCa was detected in 161 (27%) men after immediate PB, increasing to 172 (29%) men after 3 years. Seven men with negative MRI results were diagnosed with PCa by immediate PB (including 4 cases of csPCa), while 279 entered monitoring. Three-year monitoring was completed by 233 (84%) men, with 7 diagnoses of csPCa. Of 307 men with positive MRI results, 58 (19%) showed no PCa after immediate PB, of which 41 (71%) completed monitoring and 4 (7%) were diagnosed with csPCa. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, men with negative mpMRI results avoiding biopsy were not at elevated risk of csPCa. The study confirms the oncological safety of the prebiopsy MRI strategy of avoiding an immediate PB after negative MRI results when a programmatic safety net is in place.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.