ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Eye-Rubbing Detection Tool Using Artificial Intelligence on a Smartwatch in the Management of Keratoconus.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Persistent Proinflammatory Cytokine Profile in the Tear Fluid of Stable Keratoconus: Rethinking Clinical Quiescence.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence in ophthalmic education and clinical training.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Eye rubbing is considered to play a significant role in the progression of keratoconus and of corneal ectasia following refractive surgery. To our knowledge, no tool performs an objective quantitative evaluation of eye rubbing using a device that is familiar to typical patients. We introduce here an innovative solution for objectively quantifying and preventing eye rubbing. It consists of an application that uses a deep-learning artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm deployed on a smartwatch. Methods: A Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 smartwatch collected motion data from eye rubbing and everyday activities, including readings from the gyroscope, accelerometer, and linear acceleration sensors. The training of the model was carried out using two deep-learning algorithms, long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU), as well as four machine learning algorithms: random forest, K-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and XGBoost. Results: The model achieved an accuracy of 94%. The developed application could recognize, count, and display the number of eye rubbings carried out. The GRU model and XGBoost algorithm also showed promising performance. Conclusions: Automated detection of eye rubbing by deep-learning AI has been proven to be feasible. This approach could radically improve the management of patients with keratoconus and those undergoing refractive surgery. It could detect and quantify eye rubbing and help to reduce it by sending alerts directly to the patient. Translational Relevance: This proof of concept could confirm one of the most prominent paradigms in keratoconus management, the role of abnormal eye rubbing, while providing the means to challenge or even negate it by offering the first automated and objective tool for detecting eye rubbing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.