ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2025
Development of a cost-effective 3D-printed MRI phantom for enhanced teaching of system performance and image quality concepts.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing knee MRI near orthopedic hardware using a 3D-printed anatomical phantom.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Reproducibility and quality assurance in MRI.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposesThis research highlights the need for affordable phantoms for MRI education. Current options are either expensive or limited. A phantom, easy to manufacture and distribute, is proposed to demonstrate various pedagogical concepts, aiding students in understanding MRI image quality concepts.
methodsWe designed a cylindrical MRI phantom that comprises sections that can be filled with chosen liquids and gels. The dimensions were chosen to fit most consumer-grade 3D printers, facilitating widespread dissemination. It includes five modular sections for evaluating spatial resolution, geometrical accuracy, slice thickness accuracy, homogeneity, and contrast.
resultsThe modular cylindrical MRI phantom was successfully fabricated. Each section of the phantom was tested to ensure it met the specified pedagogical needs. The spatial resolution section provided clear images for evaluating fine details. The geometrical accuracy section allowed for precise measurement of distortions. The slice thickness accuracy section confirmed the consistency of slice thickness across different MRI sequences. The homogeneity section demonstrated uniform signal distribution, and the contrast section effectively displayed varying contrast levels.
conclusionsThis modular MRI phantom offers a cost-effective tool for educational purposes in MRI. Its design enables educators to demonstrate multiple pedagogical scenarios with a single object. The phantom's compatibility with consumer-grade 3D printers and its modularity makes it accessible and adaptable to various educational settings. Future work could explore further customization and enhancement of the phantom to cover additional educational needs. This tool represents a significant step toward improving MRI education and training by providing a practical, hands-on learning experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39666220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.