Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666194›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024

Arthroscopic ACL repair with suture tape augmentation: clinical, functional, and gait analysis outcomes at minimum 3-year follow-up.

Rachit Saggar, Vikram Arun Mhaskar, Rohit Bansal

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachit SaggarVardhaman Mohair Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Vikram Arun MhaskarSitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, India. drvikrammhaskar@gmail.com.
Rohit BansalSitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecent advancements in surgical techniques have led to renewed interest in ACL repair, particularly for acute, proximal tears. Suture tape augmentation (STA) has emerged as a promising technique to support ACL healing while preserving native tissue and potentially improving outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of ACL repair with STA in patients with acute, proximal ACL tears.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ACL repair with STA between June 2018 and October 2020. Inclusion criteria were acute (< 6 weeks) ACL rupture, Sherman type I tears, and minimum follow-up of 3 years. Exclusion criteria included mid-substance or distal ACL tears and previous knee surgeries. Clinical evaluation involved stability tests, PROMs, and gait analysis using Prokin WalkerView. Second-look arthroscopy and histological analysis were conducted on a subset of patients.

resultsTwelve consecutive patients (7 males and 5 females) with a mean age of 27.4 ± 7.9 years and mean BMI of 23.3 ± 1.6 kg/m

conclusionsArthroscopic ACL repair with STA provides favourable clinical, functional, and histological outcomes with low re-rupture rates when performed on acute, proximal ACL tears. This technique demonstrates fair-to-good PROMs, functional stability, and near-normal gait parameters.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAdultArthroscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGait AnalysisHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSurgical TapeSuturesSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnterior cruciate ligament repairGait analysisGraft histologyPatient-reported outcomesSecond-look arthroscopySuture tape augmentation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.