SynthesisJournal of neurology2024
Machine learning and deep learning algorithms in stroke medicine: a systematic review of hemorrhagic transformation prediction models.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Functional Outcome of Thrombectomy for Acute Posterior Circulation Artery Occlusion: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Predicting Future Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Evidence.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and methodological quality assessment of CT/MRI-based deep learning and radiomics models.Emergency radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Low atherogenic index of plasma is associated with spontaneous hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke patients: a retrospective cohort study and predictive modeling based on machine learning.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- High neutrophil-to-albumin ratio signals severe prognosis in LVO stroke-data from an EICU cohort.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based multicenter prediction of postoperative sepsis in emergency colon cancer: role of surgical approach and inflammatory markers.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Machine learning-based prediction model for post-stroke cerebral-cardiac syndrome: a risk stratification study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Current Landscape and Future Directions Regarding Generative Large Language Models in Stroke Care: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Development of a novel nomogram to predict hemorrhagic transformation following endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Impact of low-grade inflammation on neurological outcomes in patients with acute pontine infarction: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Predicting Stroke-Associated Pneumonia in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Machine Learning Model Development and Validation Study with CBC-Derived Inflammatory Indices.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, with hemorrhagic transformation (HT) further worsening outcomes. Traditional scoring systems have limited predictive accuracy for HT in AIS. Recent research has explored machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms for stroke management. This study evaluates and compares the effectiveness of ML and DL algorithms in predicting HT post-AIS, benchmarking them against conventional models.
methodsA systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE, initially yielding 1421 studies. After screening, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the quality of these studies, and a qualitative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity in the study design.
resultsThe included studies featured diverse ML and DL algorithms, with Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) being the most common. Gradient boosting (GB) showed superior performance. Median Area Under the Curve (AUC) values were 0.91 for GB, 0.83 for RF, 0.77 for LR, and 0.76 for SVM. Neural networks had a median AUC of 0.81 and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) had a median AUC of 0.91. ML techniques outperformed conventional models, particularly those integrating clinical and imaging data.
conclusionsML and DL models significantly surpass traditional scoring systems in predicting HT. These advanced models enhance clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. Future research should address data expansion, imaging protocol standardization, and model transparency to enhance stroke outcomes further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.