Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666168›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2024

Machine learning and deep learning algorithms in stroke medicine: a systematic review of hemorrhagic transformation prediction models.

Mahbod Issaiy, Diana Zarei, Shahriar Kolahi, David S Liebeskind

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahbod Issaiy *Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6407-5779
Diana Zarei *Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5468-9235
Shahriar KolahiAdvanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
David S LiebeskindComprehensive Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. davidliebeskind@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5109-8736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, with hemorrhagic transformation (HT) further worsening outcomes. Traditional scoring systems have limited predictive accuracy for HT in AIS. Recent research has explored machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms for stroke management. This study evaluates and compares the effectiveness of ML and DL algorithms in predicting HT post-AIS, benchmarking them against conventional models.

methodsA systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE, initially yielding 1421 studies. After screening, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the quality of these studies, and a qualitative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity in the study design.

resultsThe included studies featured diverse ML and DL algorithms, with Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) being the most common. Gradient boosting (GB) showed superior performance. Median Area Under the Curve (AUC) values were 0.91 for GB, 0.83 for RF, 0.77 for LR, and 0.76 for SVM. Neural networks had a median AUC of 0.81 and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) had a median AUC of 0.91. ML techniques outperformed conventional models, particularly those integrating clinical and imaging data.

conclusionsML and DL models significantly surpass traditional scoring systems in predicting HT. These advanced models enhance clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. Future research should address data expansion, imaging protocol standardization, and model transparency to enhance stroke outcomes further.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMachine LearningHumansIschemic StrokeStrokeAcute ischemic strokeDLHemorrhagic transformationMachine learningMLSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39666168
PMCPMC11638292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.