Trial reportJournal of neurology2024
Eptinezumab treatment was associated with longer interictal headache/migraine periods which corresponded to greater improvements in patient-reported quality of life measures.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02974153 (A Parallel Group, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ALD403 Administered Intravenously in Patients With Chronic Migraine), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Parallel Group, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ALD403 Administered Intravenously in Patients With Chronic Migraine
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term tolerability and effectiveness of eptinezumab in Japanese adults with chronic migraine: results of the 60-week open-label SUNSET trial.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Trial
- Interictal burden, not ictal burden, drives work productivity impairment in headache disorders: insights from a Japanese cross-sectional study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLonger periods between headache episodes (interictal periods) may provide greater time for the nervous system to reset from a previous episode, potentially improving disease status and health-related quality of life. This post hoc analysis evaluated this hypothesis by associating patients' longest interictal periods with improvements in patient-reported outcomes.
methodsPROMISE-2 (NCT02974153) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating eptinezumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine (N = 1072). Daily electronic diary data from Weeks 1-12 and Weeks 1-24 were used to identify interictal periods, defined as days between headache episodes. For each patient, the longest interictal period within these intervals was identified and categorized (1-4, 5-9, 10-14, > 14, and > 21 days). For each category, the following patient-reported outcomes were assessed: 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and patient-identified most bothersome symptom (PI-MBS).
resultsExcluding interictal periods with > 10% missing data (resulting in 1010 patients with sufficient data), the mean (SD) of longest interictal periods over Weeks 1-12 was 9.4 (11.0) days. A ≥6-point HIT-6 reduction was observed in 78% (56/72) vs 26% (91/351) of patients with a > 21-day vs 1-4-day longest interictal period, respectively; much or very much improvement per PGIC was reported in 90% (65/72) vs 25% (87/348), respectively, and per PI-MBS was reported in 88% (63/72) vs 26% (92/348), respectively. Similar results were observed for Weeks 1-24.
conclusionLonger interictal periods were associated with more patients indicating positive changes in headache-related life impact, disease status, and symptomology.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02974153; registered: 2016-11-23).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.