Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666143›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology2024

Eptinezumab treatment was associated with longer interictal headache/migraine periods which corresponded to greater improvements in patient-reported quality of life measures.

Stewart J Tepper, Merle L Diamond, Joe Hirman, Divya Asher, Damian Fiore, Roger Cady

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02974153 (A Parallel Group, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ALD403 Administered Intravenously in Patients With Chronic Migraine), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02974153 phase3completednot on this map

A Parallel Group, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ALD403 Administered Intravenously in Patients With Chronic Migraine

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlder Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.Ran2016 to 2018Enrolled1,121ConditionsMigraine DisordersArmsALD403 (Eptinezumab), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stewart J TepperNew England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, USA. sjtepper@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9879-6638
Merle L DiamondDiamond Headache Clinic, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joe HirmanPacific Northwest Statistical Consulting, Inc, Woodinville, WA, USA.
Divya AsherLundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA.
Damian FioreLundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA.
Roger CadyRK Consults, Ozark, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4081-8395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLonger periods between headache episodes (interictal periods) may provide greater time for the nervous system to reset from a previous episode, potentially improving disease status and health-related quality of life. This post hoc analysis evaluated this hypothesis by associating patients' longest interictal periods with improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

methodsPROMISE-2 (NCT02974153) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating eptinezumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine (N = 1072). Daily electronic diary data from Weeks 1-12 and Weeks 1-24 were used to identify interictal periods, defined as days between headache episodes. For each patient, the longest interictal period within these intervals was identified and categorized (1-4, 5-9, 10-14, > 14, and > 21 days). For each category, the following patient-reported outcomes were assessed: 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and patient-identified most bothersome symptom (PI-MBS).

resultsExcluding interictal periods with > 10% missing data (resulting in 1010 patients with sufficient data), the mean (SD) of longest interictal periods over Weeks 1-12 was 9.4 (11.0) days. A ≥6-point HIT-6 reduction was observed in 78% (56/72) vs 26% (91/351) of patients with a > 21-day vs 1-4-day longest interictal period, respectively; much or very much improvement per PGIC was reported in 90% (65/72) vs 25% (87/348), respectively, and per PI-MBS was reported in 88% (63/72) vs 26% (92/348), respectively. Similar results were observed for Weeks 1-24.

conclusionLonger interictal periods were associated with more patients indicating positive changes in headache-related life impact, disease status, and symptomology.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02974153; registered: 2016-11-23).

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedMigraine DisordersQuality of LifeAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedeptinezumabChronic migraineEptinezumabPatient-reported outcomesPreventive migraine treatmentQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID39666143
PMCPMC11638385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.