Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666134›Full record

ArticlePlant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2024

Gluten-free Diet, a Friend or a Foe, an American Perspective.

Tariq Alam, Gautam Saripalli, Sachin Rustgi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tariq AlamDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University Pee Dee Research and Education Center, Florence, SC, 29506, USA.
Gautam SaripalliDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University Pee Dee Research and Education Center, Florence, SC, 29506, USA.
Sachin RustgiDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University Pee Dee Research and Education Center, Florence, SC, 29506, USA. srustgi@clemson.edu.

Funding

Clemson Faculty Succeeds grant 15-202-EQUIP-5701-430-1502211NIFA Hatch/Multi-state grant S009USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture GRANT13715753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gluten proteins in cereal grains are often considered unsafe for health. Indeed, the dissemination of misinformation through various sources has led to a widespread misconception that the consumption of gluten by healthy individuals results in adverse health consequences and contributes to obesity. In recent years, many health-conscious consumers have started reducing or avoiding gluten consumption without a medical recommendation. Consequently, the adoption of gluten-free diets has expanded significantly. This study compared 39 gluten-free products and their gluten-containing counterparts for energy, sugar, dietary fiber content, and price. We found that, on average, gluten-free products available to United States consumers contained significantly less protein and more sugar and calories. Furthermore, on average, gluten-free products are more expensive than gluten-containing products. Our finding may serve as a guide for dietitians, nutritionists, and legislators in introducing a gluten-free prescription list for individuals with celiac disease, wheat allergy, and non-celiac wheat sensitivity.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseDiet, Gluten-FreeGlutensDietary FiberDietary ProteinsDietary SugarsEdible GrainEnergy IntakeHumansUnited StatesWheat HypersensitivityDietary FiberDietary ProteinsDietary SugarsGlutensCeliac DiseaseGlutenGluten-free DietNon-celiac Wheat SensitivityWheat Allergy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.