Observational studyJournal of neurology2024
Economic burden of multiple sclerosis in an Italian cohort of patients on disease-modifying therapy: analysis of disease cost and its components.
Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indirect Costs Related to Productivity Loss, Work-Related Quality of Life, and Resource Utilization in Workers with Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Global and Regional Trends in Multiple Sclerosis Incidence with Projections to 2030: A Joinpoint Regression Analysis of the GBD Data 2021 by Socio-Demographic Index and WHO Regions.Annals of global health · 2026Article
- Direct Medical Costs Associated with Multiple Sclerosis in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Single-Center Cost of Illness Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Understanding the Impact of Multiple Sclerosis on Quality of Life: An Italian Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this observational cross-sectional study conducted in Italy, sociodemographic and disease data were collected from a multiple sclerosis (MS) population treated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). A prevalence-based cost-of-illness analysis was subsequently carried out. In total, 393 MS patients were enrolled, 65.9% female, average age of 45 ± 11.5 years. 94.9% had RRMS and EDSS median value of 1.5 (1.0, 2.0). The mean total cost per MS patient was estimated at €20,299.4 per year. Total costs of MS increase by disability level, varying from 16,812.0 (minor) to 20,407.0 (mild), 27,640.7 (moderate), and 44,404.0 (severe). DMT costs accounted for 62.5% of total costs, while productivity loss accounted for 22.0%. Indeed, besides having low quality of life decline and fatigue levels, most patients enrolled retained full working capacity while 31.3% had some productivity loss. The results obtained are in line with previous studies showing that as the disease progresses, the quality of life, fatigue and working capacity worsen alongside a rise in total MS costs for either the society or the healthcare service. Clinical relapses cause a significant cost increment. This cross-sectional study provides a representation of MS quality of life and MS cost in a cohort of Italian MS patients treated with DMT, among which the majority had RRMS. This cost-of-illness analysis can provide useful information for resource allocation and help estimate the savings that can be obtained by slowing the progression of the disease. It also constitutes a primary source of data useful for conducting a complete economic evaluation analysis, including cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.