ArticleActa diabetologica2025
Cluster-based subgroups of prediabetes and its association with prediabetes progression and regression: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediabetes Subtypes with Divergent Iron Metabolism Profiles: A Cluster Analysis from Two Cohorts in the United States and China.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Subgroups of Prediabetes and the Risk of Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity in Chinese Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of diabetes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCluster analysis provides an effective approach in stratifying prediabetes into different subgroups; however, the association of the cluster-based subgroups with prediabetes progression and regression has not been investigated. We aimed to address this issue in a Chinese population.
methodsA total of 4,128 participants with prediabetes were included to generate cluster-based subgroups of prediabetes based on age, body mass index (BMI), triglyceride-and-glucose (TyG) index, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), using a k-means clustering model. Among them, 1,554 participants were followed-up for about three years to ascertain prediabetes progression and regression. Their association with the cluster-based subgroups of prediabetes was assessed using multinomial logistic regression analyses.
resultsThree clusters of prediabetes were identified among the 4,128 participants, with cluster 0, 1 and 2 accounting for 28.0%, 31.4% and 40.6%, respectively. Participants with prediabetes were featured by the youngest age and the lowest HbA1c in cluster 0, the highest BMI and TyG index in cluster 1, and the oldest age and the lowest BMI in cluster 2. After multivariable-adjustment, both cluster 1 [odds ratio (OR) 3.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.01-5.44] and cluster 2 (OR 2.58, 95% CI: 1.60-4.18) were associated with increased odds of progression to diabetes when compared with cluster 0. They were also associated with decreased odds of regression to normoglycemia (OR 0.54, and 0.56, respectively).
conclusionsPrediabetes participants featured by older age, higher degree of insulin resistance, higher BMI and worse glycemic condition had higher probability of progression to diabetes but lower chance of regression to normoglycemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39666111What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.