ArticleJournal of neurology2024
Medical costs of treating myasthenia gravis in patients who need intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) - a register-based study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Healthcare costs and burden of myasthenia gravis for patients and society: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Health economic evaluations of myasthenia gravis: a systematic review.Croatian medical journal · 2026Pooled it
- Emergency use of eculizumab in impending and manifest myasthenic crisis: a retrospective case series.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Low-dose versus standard-dose intravenous immunoglobulin in generalized myasthenia gravis: a prospective single-center cohort study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral innovative treatments are expected for myasthenia gravis (MG) in the coming years. Healthcare payers usually require cost-effectiveness analyses before reimbursement. We aimed to investigate resource utilization and direct medical costs for patients with MG treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) to inform such analyses.
methodsWe identified patients with MG in the Norwegian Patient Registry based on at least two hospital encounters with an MG diagnosis (ICD-10 G70.0) from 1 Jan 2010 to 31 Dec 2021. IVIg treatment was identified by medical procedure and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes (RPGM05 and J06BA02). Using Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) cost weights, we estimated direct medical costs for each year following the first MG diagnosis.
resultsOver the study period, 1083 patients were diagnosed with MG in Norway, of whom 155 (14.3%) were treated with IVIg. No significant differences in age or sex were observed between IVIg and non-IVIg patients. Compared with non-IVIg patients, IVIg-patients had 2.3 times higher direct medical costs during the first year after MG diagnosis (EUR 35,714 vs. EUR 15,457) and 3.1 times higher costs during the second year (EUR 19,119 vs. EUR 6256). In the fifth year after diagnosis, IVIg-patients still had higher costs and resource utilization than non-IVIg patients (EUR 9953 vs. EUR 5634).
conclusionIVIg treatment represents an important marker for high direct medical costs among patients with MG. The costs continue to be high during the first five years after MG diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.