ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Impact of the difference between preoperative planning and intraoperative femoral neck osteotomy level on stem alignment.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe combined anteversion theory is used for implant placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). While majority of the research emphasizes the precise placement of the acetabular cup, there's less focus on stem alignment. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the discrepancy between the preoperatively planned femoral neck osteotomy level and the actual osteotomy level during surgery on stem alignment. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study involved 232 patients (258 joints) who had a total hip arthroplasty (THA) between April 2018 and December 2022 at our hospital. They were implanted with either the ACTIS stem (Depuy Synthes) or Taperloc Complete XR 123° (Zimmer Biomet)-147 joints with ACTIS stem and 111 with Taperloc stem. Three-dimensional templating software was used to evaluate preoperative planning and postoperative stem placement angles. The difference between the actual and preoperatively planned osteotomy levels was also measured. The impact of this difference in femoral neck osteotomy level on stem alignment was evaluated.
resultsIn the ACTIS stem group, the femoral neck osteotomy level was - 0.3 ± 3.7 mm. The stem alignment had a varus of 1.8 ± 1.9°, extension of 0.1 ± 1.5°, and anteversion of 2.4 ± 5.9°, compared to preoperative plans. A positive correlation was identified between osteotomy level and varus/valgus alignment (r = 0.607, p < 0.01), with a weak correlation for anteversion (r = 0.236, p < 0.01). No correlation existed with flexion/extension. In the Taperloc stem group, osteotomy level was 2.2 ± 3.1 mm. The postoperative stem showed a varus of 1.6 ± 1.5°, extension of 0.5 ± 1.7°, and anteversion of 4.9 ± 6.5°. A correlation was observed between osteotomy level and varus/valgus alignment (r = 0.476, p < 0.01), but not with flexion/extension or anteversion.
conclusionsThe study examined how differences in planned vs. actual femoral neck osteotomy affect stem alignment in THA using ACTIS stem and Taperloc stem. We found that osteotomy level influenced varus/valgus alignment; mildly affected flexion/extension; and had no effect on anteversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39666028What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.