Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39666017›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2025

The Effectiveness of Caffeine in Reducing Constipation in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Anya Latthe, Albert Tan, Pallavi Latthe

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anya LattheBarnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK. anya.latthe@nhs.net.ORCID 0009-0005-9134-0581
Albert TanBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Pallavi LattheBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisConstipation is defined as infrequent stools/difficultly passing stools, or the sensation of incomplete emptying. The prevalence of constipation is estimated at 14% worldwide. Caffeine is believed to increase gastric motility in the colon, causing a laxative effect. The results of the studies in the literature are conflicting. The aim of this review is to assess the effectiveness of caffeine in reducing constipation in adults.

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Library, AMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL. Search terms included "constipation", "faecal impaction" and "caffeine" in different forms. The screening of the titles was carried out by two independent reviewers for trials that assessed the effect of caffeine on constipation. We assessed the quality of the studies included and the data collated. ROBINS-I and risk-of-bias tools were employed to assess for risk of bias in the studies included.

resultsEight studies were included in the final review. The studies assessed caffeine in the forms of coffee, tea, energy drinks, cocoa and kombucha with different doses. Three studies were at a low risk of bias, 3 were at a moderate risk of bias and the randomised controlled trial (RCT) had some concerns regarding blinding. Four studies concluded that caffeine may be effective in reducing constipation and 4 studies showed no improvement or an increase in constipation. Meta-analysis was not done as the studies were too dissimilar in interventions and outcome assessments.

conclusionThe results of the studies are conflicting. Further rigorously designed and conducted RCTs need to be carried out to substantiate the effectiveness of caffeine on reducing constipation in adults.

Indexed as

CaffeineConstipationAdultCoffeeFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeCaffeineCoffeeBowelsCaffeineCoffeeConstipationSystematic reviewTea

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.