Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39665860›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2025

Effects of delayed consent on patient characteristics in adult patients with sepsis.

Frank Bloos, Holger Bogatsch, Mihai G Netea, Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Michael Bauer, SepNet Critical Care Trials Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07553650 (Master Study Protocol for the Cohort of the Specialist Network Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07553650 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Master Study Protocol for the Cohort of the Specialist Network Stroke (SN Stroke) (Stroke-CORE)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2026 to 2030Enrolled12,750ConditionsIntracerebral Haemorrhage, Paediatric Stroke, Stroke Acute, Stroke
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Acute Care Research Requires an Adapted Consent Procedure to Safeguard Participants' Autonomy and Rights While Limiting the Risk of Consent-Bias.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Frank BloosDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-7941
Holger BogatschInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE) and Clinical Trial Centre Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Mihai G NeteaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-6052
Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis4th Department of Internal MedicineMedical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4713-3911
Michael BauerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. michael.bauer@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1521-3514
SepNet Critical Care Trials Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID39665860
PMCPMC11787253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.