ArticleExperimental brain research2024
Repeated epidural stimulation modulates cervical spinal cord excitability in healthy adult rats.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Review Examining Upper Extremity Neuromotor Control, Recovery Mechanisms, and Future Directions.Journal of neurotrauma · 2024Review
- Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of motor-evoked potential recruitment curves yields accurate and robust estimates.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal evoked motor responses (SEMR) are utilized in longitudinal pre-clinical and human studies to reflect the in-vivo physiological changes in neural networks secondary to a spinal cord injury (SCI) or neuro-rehabilitative treatments utilizing epidural stimulation (ES). However, it remains unknown whether the repeated ES exposure during SEMR testing itself modulates spinal cord physiology and accompanying SEMR characteristics. To answer this, ES was delivered to the cervical spinal cord using standard stimulation paradigms during multiple SEMR data acquisition sessions (~ 17 h spanning across 100 days) in ten healthy adult rats. Cervical SEMR at rest and forelimb muscle activity during reaching and grasping task were collected before and after 100 days. We noted a persistent increase in SEMR activity relative to baseline, with prominent changes in the mono and poly-synaptic components of SEMR. The findings indicate increased spinal cord excitability. Increased spinal cord excitability translated into increased forelimb muscle activation during the reaching and grasping task. For the majority of SEMR and muscle activity increase, effect size was large or very large. Cervical SEMR are amenable to modulation by routine ES testing protocols, with prominent changes in the mono and poly-synaptic components of SEMR. Since repeated stimulation during multiple testing alone increases cord excitability, we recommend (1) SEMR may be used with caution to infer the physiological status of the spinal circuitry (2) utilizing appropriate control groups and motor behavioral correlates for meaningful functional interpretation in longitudinal neuromodulation studies involving multiple SEMR testing sessions following a SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39665849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.