Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39665844›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2024

Pathophysiology and Management of Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Jennifer I Stern, Rushna Ali, Chia-Chun Chiang, Carrie E Robertson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer I SternDepartment of Neurology, Headache Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Rushna AliDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 201st Street Southwest, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA.
Chia-Chun ChiangDepartment of Neurology, Headache Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7802-7172
Carrie E RobertsonDepartment of Neurology, Headache Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. robertson.carrie@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9382-0897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDiscuss the current understanding of the pathophysiology and management of refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN). This includes a discussion on why TN can recur after microvascular decompression and a discussion on "outside of the box" options when both first- and second-line management strategies have been exhausted. RECENT

findingsThis review discusses second- and third-line oral medication options, botulinum toxin A, repeat microvascular decompression, repeat ablative procedures, internal neurolysis, trigeminal branch blockade, and neuromodulation using TMS or peripheral stimulation. Additional management for chronic neuropathic facial pain such as deep brain stimulation, motor cortex stimulation, and focused ultrasound thalamotomy are also discussed, though evidence in trigeminal neuralgia is limited. Treatment of recurrent TN despite multiple surgeries can be challenging, and multiple minimally invasive and more invasive management options have been reported in small studies and case reports. Further studies are needed to determine an optimal stepwise approach.

Indexed as

Trigeminal NeuralgiaBotulinum Toxins, Type ADeep Brain StimulationHumansMicrovascular Decompression SurgeryBotulinum Toxins, Type AFacial painMicrovascular decompressionRefractoryTrigeminal ganglionTrigeminal neuralgiaTrigeminal neuropathy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.