Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39665839›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

Perceptions and attitudes regarding robotic total hip arthroplasty: a patient stakeholder survey.

Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Asher Selznick, Kamal Bali, Yasaman Amini, Isabelle Tate, Thomas J Wood

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hassaan Abdel KhalikDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1711-515X
Asher SelznickDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9382-1606
Kamal BaliDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0109-6449
Yasaman AminiHamilton Arthroplasty Group, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, 711 Concession Street B3, Hamilton, ON, L8V 1C3, Canada.
Isabelle TateHamilton Arthroplasty Group, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, 711 Concession Street B3, Hamilton, ON, L8V 1C3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6055-132X
Thomas J WoodDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada. thomas.wood@medportal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0291-444X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To describe the attitudes and preferences of patients pertaining to robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RA-THA) with the long-term objective of designing a prospective randomized-controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of RA-THA compared to conventional technique. A cross-sectional survey of patients attending an outpatient high-volume academic arthroplasty clinic chosen was administered from December 2023 to May 2024. The survey comprised 31 items including patient demographic, patient reported factors of significance and perceptions surrounding RA-THA. Ninety-seven patients completed the survey with a mean age of 67.5 ± 9.1 years and with 63% of patients being female. The majority of respondents were not at all familiar with RA-THA (69%). Common perceptions of RA-THA compared to conventional technique included a smaller incision (41%), lower chance of developing infection (47%), shorter length of surgery (41%), less blood loss (41%), lower cost (22%), shorter length of stay (30%), more precise implant positioning (46.8%), lower post-operative pain (29%), and lower post-operative complications (36%). Very important outcomes to be assessed in future investigations included post-operative range of motion (91%), implant longevity (91%), dislocation risk (90%), post-operative pain (89%), and infection risk (87%). Patient familiarity with robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty is low. Patient perceptions regarding RA-THA compared to conventional technique are favorable, despite limited evidence to date. Important factors to be assessed in future RCTs include range of motion, implant longevity, dislocation risk, and infection risk. Findings of this study can inform a clinically relevant RCT assessing RA-THA compared to conventional technique.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesRoboticsRobotic surgerySurveyTotal hip arthroplastyTotal joint arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.