ArticleBJS open2024
Tumour biology and survival outcomes in young women with breast cancer: single-centre retrospective analysis.
Article in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Baseline Body Composition Characteristics and Overall Survival in Young Women with Breast Cancer: Matched Case-Control Study Nested Within a Cohort.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBreast cancer is the most common malignancy worldwide. The disease is more severe in younger women and often confers a poorer prognosis. This study aimed to profile a cohort of young women with breast cancer and address whether aspects of their tumour biology were related to their long-term outcomes.
methodsThe records of consecutive women aged 40 and under with a diagnosis of breast cancer at a single centre between 1 January 2010 and 30 December 2015 were analysed and a profile was created. They were followed up until 19 July 2023 (median 112 months, range 4-161), and the impact of oestrogen positivity (ER+), human epidermal growth factor 2 positivity (HER2+), tumour grade, axillary lymph node metastases and Ki67 value on overall survival and disease-free interval (DFI) was investigated.
resultsOne hundred and sixty-four patients were included. Younger patients typically presented with large, high-grade tumours with axillary lymph node metastases, and 83.2% of the cohort were alive at 5 years. ER+ tumours appeared to have a better 5-year survival: ER+/HER2- 86.3%, ER+/HER2+ 88.5%, ER-/HER2+ 71.4%, and triple-negative (ER-/HER2-) 70.8%. However, neither the log-rank test nor the Cox regression model found a significant effect of ER status and long-term survival (P = 0.485 and P = 0.158 respectively). DISCUSSION: Young patients with breast cancer have a lower 5-year survival than the UK average for all ages, and patients in this single-centre study with ER+ tumours appeared to have better short-term but similar longer-term outcomes compared to ER- breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.