ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2024
Molecular and Microbial Detections of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli in Dental Caries: An Experimental Study on Iranian Children Aged 5-9.
Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Streptococcus dentisani and Streptococcus mutans in dental biofilm of preschoolers with and without early childhood caries: a cross-sectional study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Article
- Antibacterial effect, antiadherence, and antiacidogenicity properties of a dental varnish containing silver nanoparticles: an in vitro study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLactobacilli and Streptococcus mutans are stigmatized as cariogenic bacteria, but few studies have simultaneously examined the quantitative and qualitative aspects of lactobacilli and S. mutans in childhood dental caries. Therefore, this study aimed to detect the presence of S. mutans and lactobacilli in dental caries using Snyder's test, colony counting, and PCR in the primary teeth of Iranian children with dental caries. MATERIAL AND
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Kerman, Iran, from March to Jun 2024. After dental examinations, 120 eligible children aged 5-9 were chosen using simple random sampling and classified into four groups based on their decayed, missing, and filled (primary) teeth (dmft) index: Group 1 (dmft = 0), Group 2 (dmft = 4-6), Group 3 (dmft = 7-9), and Group 4 (dmft = 10-13). The salivary levels of lactobacilli and S. mutans were calculated using colony counting (CFU/ml). Moreover, Snyder's test was applied to evaluate caries activity. PCR was also performed for molecular detection of lactobacilli (16S rRNA gene) and S. mutans (gftB gene). Lastly, the association between bacterial counting, molecular findings, and Snyder's test was estimated through statistical methods using SPSS 27.
resultsSignificant differences were found between the age and the PCR results of lactobacilli and S. mutans among all dmft Groups (p < 0.05). Moreover, positive significant correlations were observed between the counts of lactobacilli and S. mutans in dmft Group 1 compared to other dmft Groups (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the counts of these two bacteria differed significantly in Snyder's test (p < 0.05). However, Snyder's test differed significantly from the S. mutans PCR (p < 0.05), but not from the lactobacilli PCR (p > 0.05).
conclusionsThe results of the study could potentially be considered a promising and cost-effective screening program to identify children who are susceptible to dental caries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.