Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39665649›Full record

ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2025

Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer - Primary Results of the INSEMA Trial.

Toralf Reimer, Angrit Stachs, Kristina Veselinovic, Thorsten Kühn, Jörg Heil, Silke Polata, Frederik Marmé, Thomas Müller, Guido Hildebrandt, David Krug and 13 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 180 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02466737 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Comparison of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Versus no Axillary Surgery in Patients With Early-stage Invasive Breast Cancer and Breast-conserving Surgery: a Randomized Prospective Surgical Trial. Intergroup-Sentinel-Mamma (INSEMA)-Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of RostockRan2015 to 2029Enrolled5,505ConditionsBreast CancerArmsno axillary surgery versus SLNB, SLNB versus completion ALND
NCT07304934 recruitingnot on this map

A Prospective Multi-center Cohort Study Based on Deep Learning-based cfDNA Fragment Omics to Verify the TuFEst Model for Axillary Lymph Node Status Assessment in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Primary Surgery or Neoadjuvant Therapy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineRan2025 to 2027Enrolled400ConditionsBreast Cancer, Axillary Lymph Node MetastasisArmsNo Intervention: Observational Cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer-regional nodal irradiation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. SEOM-GEICAM-SOLTI clinical guidelines for early-stage breast cancer (UPDATE 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Toralf ReimerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Angrit StachsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Kristina VeselinovicUniversity Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Thorsten KühnHospital Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.
Jörg HeilUniversity Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4684-9099
Silke PolataEvang. Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Berlin.
Frederik MarméFaculty of Medicine Mannheim, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Thomas MüllerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hanau City Hospital, Hanau, Germany.
Guido HildebrandtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
David KrugDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Beyhan AtasevenMedical School and University Medical Center OWL, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Bielefeld University, Klinikum Lippe, Detmold, Germany.
Roland ReitsamerSalzburg Regional Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.
Sylvia RuthJohanniter Hospital Genthin-Stendal, Stendal, Germany.
Carsten DenkertInstitute of Pathology, Philipps University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany.
Inga BekesUniversity Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Dirk-Michael ZahmSRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany.
Marc ThillDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Michael GolattaUniversity Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Johannes HoltschmidtGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Michael KnauerTumor and Breast Center Eastern Switzerland, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Valentina NekljudovaGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Sibylle LoiblGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Bernd GerberDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Krebshilfe 110580Deutsche Krebshilfe 70110580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether surgical axillary staging as part of breast-conserving therapy can be omitted without compromising survival has remained unclear.

methodsIn this prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial, we investigated the omission of axillary surgery as compared with sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer staged as T1 or T2 (tumor size, ≤5 cm) who were scheduled to undergo breast-conserving surgery. We report here the per-protocol analysis of invasive disease-free survival (the primary efficacy outcome). To show the noninferiority of the omission of axillary surgery, the 5-year invasive disease-free survival rate had to be at least 85%, and the upper limit of the confidence interval for the hazard ratio for invasive disease or death had to be below 1.271.

resultsA total of 5502 eligible patients (90% with clinical T1 cancer and 79% with pathological T1 cancer) underwent randomization in a 1:4 ratio. The per-protocol population included 4858 patients; 962 were assigned to undergo treatment without axillary surgery (the surgery-omission group), and 3896 to undergo sentinel-lymph-node biopsy (the surgery group). The median follow-up was 73.6 months. The estimated 5-year invasive disease-free survival rate was 91.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.9 to 93.5) among patients in the surgery-omission group and 91.7% (95% CI, 90.8 to 92.6) among patients in the surgery group, with a hazard ratio of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14), which was below the prespecified noninferiority margin. The analysis of the first primary-outcome events (occurrence or recurrence of invasive disease or death from any cause), which occurred in a total of 525 patients (10.8%), showed apparent differences between the surgery-omission group and the surgery group in the incidence of axillary recurrence (1.0% vs. 0.3%) and death (1.4% vs. 2.4%). The safety analysis indicates that patients in the surgery-omission group had a lower incidence of lymphedema, greater arm mobility, and less pain with movement of the arm or shoulder than patients who underwent sentinel-lymph-node biopsy.

conclusionsIn this trial involving patients with clinically node-negative, T1 or T2 invasive breast cancer (90% with clinical T1 cancer and 79% with pathological T1 cancer), omission of surgical axillary staging was noninferior to sentinel-lymph-node biopsy after a median follow-up of 6 years. (Funded by the German Cancer Aid; INSEMA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02466737.).

Indexed as

Breast Cancer LymphedemaBreast NeoplasmsMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAxillaDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic Metastasis

Identifiers

PMID39665649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.