ArticleJAMA2025
Active Monitoring With or Without Endocrine Therapy for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: The COMET Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02926911 (Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy (COMET) Trial For Low Risk DCIS: A Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cryoablation for early-stage invasive breast cancer: pathologic and imaging outcomes from the prospective FIRST trial.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Trial
- De-escalation of breast surgery for early stage breast cancer.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Active Monitoring versus Surgical Excision for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Observational
- Development of a Nomogram-Based Clinical Estimation Model for Pathological Upstaging in Patients With Preoperative Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Oestrogen receptor testing and initiation of adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- MRI-based radiomics with SHAP interpretation for preoperative prediction of upstaging in ductal carcinomaTranslational cancer research · 2026Article
- Top advances of the year: Breast cancer.Cancer · 2026Article
- Prognostic Implications of Calcification and Surgery Type by Estrogen Receptor and HER2 Status in Ductal CarcinomaJournal of breast cancer · 2026Article
- Five Decades of Innovation-Tailored Breast Cancer Treatment: 1976-2026.World journal of surgery · 2026Review
- Complete Imaging Resolution of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ During Osimertinib Therapy for Synchronous EGFR Exon 19-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Headwinds in Breast Cancer Research: The Case for Pragmatic Radiotherapy De-escalation Studies.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Article
- Recurrence Patterns and Overtreatment in Pure DCIS: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Follow-Up Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- High-depth whole genome sequencing of premalignant breast lesions reveals rearrangement hotspots and personalized management opportunities.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Multigene Germline Testing in Patients with DCIS vs Invasive Breast Cancer in a Large, Integrated Health Care System.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Editorial: focus on the COMET trial.BJC reports · 2026Article
- Labels, Language and Other Strategies to Improve Communication About Lowest Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Qualitative Interviews With Women and Physicians.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- External Validation of a Pragmatic Scoring System for Predicting Upgrade of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at the Time of Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- From overtreatment to precision: a new clinical standard for DCIS management.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Article
- Spatial proteomics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ reveal distinct regional differences.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2026.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Active monitoring for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has been proposed as an alternative to guideline-concordant care, but the safety of this approach is unknown. Objective: To compare rates of invasive cancer in patients with low-risk DCIS receiving active monitoring vs guideline-concordant care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective, randomized noninferiority trial enrolling 995 women aged 40 years or older with a new diagnosis of hormone receptor-positive grade 1 or grade 2 DCIS without invasive cancer at 100 US Alliance Cancer Cooperative Group clinical trial sites from 2017 to 2023. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive active monitoring (follow-up every 6 months with breast imaging and physical examination; n = 484) or guideline-concordant care (surgery with or without radiation therapy; n = 473). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 2-year cumulative risk of ipsilateral invasive cancer diagnosis, according to planned intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, with a noninferiority bound of 5%. Results: The median age of the 957 participants analyzed was 63.6 (95% CI, 55.5-70.5) years in the guideline-concordant care group and 63.7 (95% CI, 60.0-71.6) years in the active monitoring group. Overall, 15.7% of participants were Black and 75.0% were White. In this prespecified primary analysis, median follow-up was 36.9 months; 346 patients had surgery for DCIS, 264 in the guideline-concordant care group and 82 in the active monitoring group. Forty-six women were diagnosed with invasive cancer, 19 in the active monitoring group and 27 in the guideline-concordant care group. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative rate of ipsilateral invasive cancer was 4.2% in the active monitoring group vs 5.9% in the guideline-concordant care group, a difference of -1.7% (upper limit of the 95% CI, 0.95%), indicating that active monitoring is not inferior to guideline-concordant care. Invasive tumor characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Women with low-risk DCIS randomized to active monitoring did not have a higher rate of invasive cancer in the same breast at 2 years compared with those randomized to guideline-concordant care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02926911.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.