Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39665585›Full record

ArticleJAMA2025

Active Monitoring With or Without Endocrine Therapy for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: The COMET Randomized Clinical Trial.

E Shelley Hwang, Terry Hyslop, Thomas Lynch, Marc D Ryser, Anna Weiss, Anna Wolf, Kelsey Norris, Meredith Witten, Lars Grimm, Stuart Schnitt and 28 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02926911 (Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02926911 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy (COMET) Trial For Low Risk DCIS: A Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlliance Foundation Trials, LLC.Ran2017 to 2030Enrolled997ConditionsDCIS, Ductal Carcinoma in SituArmsSurgery, Active Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. De-escalation of breast surgery for early stage breast cancer.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Active Monitoring versus Surgical Excision for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Headwinds in Breast Cancer Research: The Case for Pragmatic Radiotherapy De-escalation Studies.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors.

E Shelley HwangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Terry HyslopDepartment of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Thomas LynchDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Marc D RyserDepartments of Population Health Sciences and Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Anna WeissDepartment of Surgery/Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Anna WolfAlliance Foundation Trials, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kelsey NorrisAlliance Foundation Trials, Boston, Massachusetts.
Meredith WittenAurora Health Care, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Lars GrimmDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Stuart SchnittDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sunil BadveDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Rachel FactorDepartment of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Elizabeth FrankCOMET Study Patient Leadership Team, Alliance Foundation Trials, Boston, Massachusetts.
Deborah CollyarCOMET Study Patient Leadership Team, Alliance Foundation Trials, Boston, Massachusetts.
Desiree BasilaCOMET Study Patient Leadership Team, Alliance Foundation Trials, Boston, Massachusetts.
Donna PintoCOMET Study Patient Leadership Team, Alliance Foundation Trials, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mark A WatsonDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Robert WestDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Louise DaviesThe VA Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction Vermont and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Jenny L DonovanPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Ayako ShimadaDivision of Biostatistics/Bioinformatics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Yutong LiDivision of Biostatistics/Bioinformatics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Yan LiDuke Cancer Institute Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Antonia V BennettDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Shoshana RosenbergDivision of Epidemiology, Weill Cornell University, New York, New York.
Jeffrey MarksDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Eric WinerSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Marc BoisvertDivision of Breast Surgery, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.
Armando GiulianoDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Kelsey E LarsonDepartment of Surgery, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City.
Kathleen YostCancer Research Consortium of West Michigan NCORP, Grand Rapids.
Priscilla F McAuliffeDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Amy KrieMetro MN Community Oncology Research Consortium, St Louis Park, Minnesota.
Nina TamirisaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Lisa A CareyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Alastair M ThompsonDepartment of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Ann H PartridgeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
COMET Study Investigators

Funding

Michigan Cancer Research Consortium NCORPUG1CA189971 · NCI · SAINT JOSEPH MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM · PI Tareq Al baghdadi · 2014 to 2026
$36.6M
Rochester Network Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233230 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Paul M Barr · 2019 to 2026
$6.9M
Research Capacity Building by a Clinician Scientist within the Michigan Cancer Research Consortium- National Community Oncology Research ProgramR50CA288382 · NCI · SAINT JOSEPH MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM · PI Elie G Dib · 2024 to 2026
$340k
NCI NIH HHS R50 CA288382NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189971NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Active monitoring for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has been proposed as an alternative to guideline-concordant care, but the safety of this approach is unknown. Objective: To compare rates of invasive cancer in patients with low-risk DCIS receiving active monitoring vs guideline-concordant care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective, randomized noninferiority trial enrolling 995 women aged 40 years or older with a new diagnosis of hormone receptor-positive grade 1 or grade 2 DCIS without invasive cancer at 100 US Alliance Cancer Cooperative Group clinical trial sites from 2017 to 2023. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive active monitoring (follow-up every 6 months with breast imaging and physical examination; n = 484) or guideline-concordant care (surgery with or without radiation therapy; n = 473). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 2-year cumulative risk of ipsilateral invasive cancer diagnosis, according to planned intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, with a noninferiority bound of 5%. Results: The median age of the 957 participants analyzed was 63.6 (95% CI, 55.5-70.5) years in the guideline-concordant care group and 63.7 (95% CI, 60.0-71.6) years in the active monitoring group. Overall, 15.7% of participants were Black and 75.0% were White. In this prespecified primary analysis, median follow-up was 36.9 months; 346 patients had surgery for DCIS, 264 in the guideline-concordant care group and 82 in the active monitoring group. Forty-six women were diagnosed with invasive cancer, 19 in the active monitoring group and 27 in the guideline-concordant care group. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative rate of ipsilateral invasive cancer was 4.2% in the active monitoring group vs 5.9% in the guideline-concordant care group, a difference of -1.7% (upper limit of the 95% CI, 0.95%), indicating that active monitoring is not inferior to guideline-concordant care. Invasive tumor characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Women with low-risk DCIS randomized to active monitoring did not have a higher rate of invasive cancer in the same breast at 2 years compared with those randomized to guideline-concordant care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02926911.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingWatchful WaitingAdultAgedBreastFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessProspective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID39665585
PMCPMC11920841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.