Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39665571›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2024

A Multidisciplinary Approach That Considers Occurrence, Geochemistry, Bioavailability, and Toxicity to Prioritize Critical Minerals for Environmental Research.

Sarah Jane O White, Tyler J Kane, Kate M Campbell, Marie-Noële Croteau, Michael Iacchetta, Johanna M Blake, Charles A Cravotta, Bethany K Kunz, Charles N Alpers, Jill A Jenkins and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah Jane O WhiteU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 20192, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4055-8207
Tyler J KaneU.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2511-7312
Kate M CampbellU.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8715-5544
Marie-Noële CroteauU.S. Geological Survey, Moffett Field, California 94035, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0346-3580
Michael IacchettaU.S. Geological Survey, Columbia, Missouri 65201, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9459-1435
Johanna M BlakeU.S. Geological Survey, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4667-0096
Charles A CravottaU.S. Geological Survey, New Cumberland, Pennsylvania 17070, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3116-4684
Bethany K KunzU.S. Geological Survey, Columbia, Missouri 65201, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7193-9336
Charles N AlpersU.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, California 95819, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6945-7365
Jill A JenkinsU.S. Geological Survey, Lafayette, Lousiana 70506, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5087-0894
Katherine Walton-DayU.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9146-6193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical minerals (or critical elements) are minerals or elements that are essential to global security and development and have supply chains vulnerable to disruption. In general, knowledge of the environmental behavior and health effects of critical elements is needed to support the development of safe and environmentally responsible supplies. This knowledge includes identifying potential consequences of increased critical element production and use, alternative critical element sources such as mine wastes, and adverse effects of critical elements on ecosystem condition and organismal health. Here we identify significant data gaps in the understanding of critical elements in surficial and aquatic environments, and the need, given the large number of commodities (50) identified on the 2022 critical minerals list for the United States, for an approach to prioritize them for study of their environmental fate and effects. We propose a multidisciplinary approach for this prioritization, considering measures of occurrence, geochemistry, bioavailability, and toxicity. We describe relatively easy-to-obtain metrics for each of these topic areas and demonstrate the utility of this integrated prioritization approach using indium and zinc as examples. This approach facilitates prioritizing research with a focus on those critical elements that are most mobile in the environment, bioavailable, toxic, or simply lacking data in these categories.

Indexed as

MineralsBiological AvailabilityEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental ScienceMineralscritical elementsenvironmental behaviorenvironmental health effectssustainable resourcestechnology critical elementsTrace metals

Identifiers

PMID39665571
PMCPMC11673130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.