Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39665534›Full record

SynthesisCritical care explorations2024

Rehabilitation and Social Determinants of Health in Critical Illness Recovery Literature: A Systematic Review.

Lindsey E Fresenko, Charlotte Rutherfurd, Lauren E Robinson, Cayla M Robinson, Ashley A Montgomery-Yates, Rachel Hogg-Graham, Peter E Morris, Tammy L Eaton, Joanne M McPeake, Kirby P Mayer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care explorations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lindsey E FresenkoCollege of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.ORCID 0000-0001-8327-0361
Charlotte RutherfurdEasterseals, Massachusetts, MA.
Lauren E RobinsonMedical Center Library, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Cayla M RobinsonMedical Center Library, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Ashley A Montgomery-YatesDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Rachel Hogg-GrahamCollege of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Peter E MorrisDepartment of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Tammy L EatonSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Joanne M McPeakeThe Healthcare Improvement Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kirby P MayerCollege of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001997 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI PENDERGAST, JULIE S, STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2016 to 2025
$4.2M
Cellular and Physical Function Outcomes Leading to Failed Muscle Recovery After Critical IllnessK23AR079583 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Kirby P Mayer · 2022 to 2026
$744k
NCATS NIH HHS L32 TR005558NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001997NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR079583NIMHD NIH HHS L32 MD017732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatients who survive critical illness navigate arduous and disparate recovery pathways that include referrals and participation in community-based rehabilitation services. Examining rehabilitation pathways during recovery is crucial to understanding the relationship on patient-centered outcomes. Furthermore, an understanding of social determinants of health (SDOH) in relation to outcomes and rehabilitation use will help ensure equitable access for future care. Therefore, there is a need to define and understand patient care pathways, specifically rehabilitation after discharge, through a SDOH lens after surviving a critical illness to improve long-term outcomes. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate), the CINAHL, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: A systematic review of the literature was completed examining literature from inception to March 2024. Articles were included if post-hospital rehabilitation utilization was reported in adult patients who survived critical illness. Discharge disposition was examined as a proxy for rehabilitation pathways. Patients were grouped by patient diagnosis for grouped analysis and reporting of data. Two independent researchers reviewed manuscripts for inclusion and data were extracted by one reviewer using Covidence. Both reviewers used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess risk of bias. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 72 articles included, only four articles reported detailed rehabilitation utilization. The majority of the studies included were cohort studies (91.7%) with most articles using a retrospective design (56.9%). The most common patient population was acute respiratory diagnoses (51.4%). Most patients were discharged directly home from the hospital (75.4%). Race/ethnicity was the most frequently reported SDOH (43.1%) followed by insurance status (13.9%) and education (13.9%).

conclusionsThe small number of articles describing rehabilitative utilization allows for limited understanding of rehabilitation pathways following critical illness. The reporting of detailed rehabilitation utilization and SDOH are limited in the literature but may play a vital role in the recovery and outcomes of survivors of critical illness.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessSocial Determinants of HealthHumansPatient DischargeRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39665534
PMCPMC11644866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.