ArticleJournal of extracellular vesicles2024
Direct imaging with multidimensional labelling and high-content analysis allows quantitative categorization and characterizations of individual small extracellular vesicles and nanoparticles (sEVPs).
Article in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- iEVIP: a dual-inspired intelligent platform for smart response extracellular vesicle isolation and single-vesicle profiling.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Light-induced extracellular vesicle and particle adsorption.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Obesity and Adipose-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Implications for Metabolic Regulation and Disease.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Direct imaging with multidimensional labelling and high-content analysis allows quantitative categorization and characterizations of individual small extracellular vesicles and nanoparticles (sEVPs).Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Small extracellular vesicles and nanoparticles (sEVPs) are cell-secreted entities with potential as diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic vehicles. However, significant intrinsic sEVP heterogeneity impedes analysis and understanding of their composition and functions. We employ multidimensional fluorescent labelling on sEVPs, leveraging the robustness of a newly developed membrane probe-conjugated oligoelectrolytes (COEs), and conduct total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy on sEVP arrays. These arrays comprise single sEVPs anchored to a soft material functionalized surface with little bias. We then develop an enhanced algorithm for colocalization analysis of the multiple labels on individual sEVPs and perform deep profiling of particle content. We categorize sEVPs derived from the same cell type into seven distinct subpopulations-some vesicular whereas others non-vesicular, and we demonstrate that sEVPs from four cell types exhibit quantitatively distinguishable subpopulation distributions. Furthermore, we gain insights into specific particle features within each subpopulation, including CD63 counts, relative particle size, relative concentration of cargoes, and correlations among different cargoes. This high-content analysis reveals common cargo sorting features in sEVP subpopulations across different cell types and suggests new statistics within the sEVP inherent heterogeneity that could differentiate sEVPs from two types of cancer cells and two types of normal cells. Collectively, our study presents a robust single-sEVP characterization platform, combining high-content imaging with comprehensive analysis. This platform is poised to advance sEVP-based theranostic assays and facilitate exploration into disease-associated sEVP biogenesis and sEVP-mediated intercellular communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.