ArticleActa ophthalmologica2025
Relationship between the full-field stimulus test and self-reported visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: REPEAT Study report No. 3.
Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Full-Field Stimulus Threshold: A Key Functional Outcome Measure in Retinal Diseases and Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical endpoints special session, ISCEV 2025, Utrecht.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Characterising PRPF31-associated retinal dystrophy: Clinical insights from baseline data in a natural history study.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- Location and Identity of Photoreceptors Contributing to the Full-Field Stimulus Test (FST).Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Review
- Relationship between the full-field stimulus test and self-reported visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: REPEAT Study report No. 3.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Article
- CRB1 -Associated Inherited Retinal Dystrophies: Prospective Natural History Study With 4 Years of Follow-Up.Clinical & experimental ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the relationship between the full-field stimulus test (FST) and self-reported visual function using the Michigan Retinal Degeneration Questionnaire (MRDQ) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP).
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, patients with clinically diagnosed RP (n = 31) performed FST to determine retinal sensitivity thresholds for blue, red and white stimuli. The difference between the blue and red thresholds was used to identify photoreceptor mediation type. Patients completed the MRDQ from which disability (Θ) scores were derived across seven visual function domains. Correlations between the FST thresholds and MRDQ domain Θ-scores were analysed using Spearman's rank correlation.
resultsThe median age was 38.0 years, and photoreceptor mediation was rod-based in 11 patients (35.5%), cone-based in seven patients (22.6%) and mixed in 13 patients (41.9%). The highest disability scores were reported in the domains of 'mesopic peripheral function' and 'scotopic function'. Significant correlations were found between all chromatic stimuli thresholds and the MRDQ domains of 'scotopic function', 'mesopic peripheral function' and 'photopic peripheral function'. The strongest correlations of these domains were observed with the blue FST (p < 0.001). The threshold on blue stimulus FST and age were significant predictors of the domain scores on 'scotopic function' (p < 0.001), 'mesopic peripheral function' (p < 0.001) and 'photopic peripheral function' (p < 0.001).
conclusionsStrong correlations between MRDQ domains related to rod function and FST were found in patients with RP. These findings confirm that FST can be used as an informative and clinically relevant endpoint in RP trials when evaluating therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.