SynthesisNursing open2024
Educational Interventions for Haemodialysis Patients in the Transplant Process: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topic Modeling of Nursing Documentation in Hemodialysis Units: A Mixed-Methods Study of Nursing Surveillance Activities.Journal of nursing management · 2026Observational
- Effects of a structured nutrition education program on dialysis adequacy and clinical outcomes in maintenance hemodialysis patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing the Information Support Provided by Health Care Professionals to Patients in a Dialysis Center Regarding Kidney Transplantation: A Nationwide Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo systematically evaluate empirical studies investigating nursing educational interventions for patients with haemodialysis at the different stages of cadaveric kidney transplantation and synthesise these findings.
designA systematic review of clinical interventions.
methodsOn clinical trials published in Spanish and English, between January 2005 and July 2022, in the main databases. The number of studies identified is shown in the flowchart of the PRISMA review. For the critical assessment of the scientific quality of the studies, the CASPe checklist and the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool were applied.
resultsEleven studies were obtained in which nursing educational interventions focused on posttransplantations and one that considered care from the person's admission to hospital were evaluated. The results obtained identified four themes: health education, empowerment, quality of life and holistic patient care with the help of different support methods, including individual and personalised support, group format and informational support via an educational brochure, telephone and website.
conclusionThe reviewed studies suggest that after receiving educational interventions patient dialysis treatment and kidney transplant recipient, have better health outcomes. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Larger studies are needed to promote a comprehensive and continuous self-care model throughout the kidney transplant process. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING HEALTH EDUCATION: Nursing educational interventions are necessary throughout the transplantation process for the patient dialysis and the family in a comprehensive and continuous manner. In the future, clinical trial studies are needed at the pretransplantation stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.