Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39665206›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2025

Clinical interrogation of

Jayastu Senapati, Sanam Loghavi, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Guillin Tang, Tapan Kadia, Nicholas J Short, Hussein A Abbas, Naszrin Arani, Courtney D DiNardo, Gautam Borthakur and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Treatment ofHaematologica · 2026
    Trial
  2. Azacitidine, Venetoclax, and Magrolimab in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Phase Ib/II Study and Correlative Analysis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Jayastu SenapatiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Sanam LoghaviDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Guillin TangDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Tapan KadiaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Nicholas J ShortDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Hussein A AbbasDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Naszrin AraniDepartment of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Courtney D DiNardoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Gautam BorthakurDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Naveen PemmarajuDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Betul OranDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Elizabeth ShpallDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Uday PopatDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Richard ChamplinDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Sherry PierceDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Sankalp AroraDepartment of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ghayas IssaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Musa YilmazDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Keyur PatelDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Koichi TakahashiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Guillermo Montalban-BravoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Danielle HammondDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Fadi G HaddadDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Hagop M KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Naval G DaverDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. ndaver@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with TP53 aberrations, dissecting the interaction amongst patient, disease and treatment factors are important for therapeutic decisions and prognostication. This retrospective analysis included patients with newly diagnosed MDS (>5% blasts) and AML with TP53 mutation(s) treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center. We factored patient age, TP53 aberration burden, therapy intensity and use of venetoclax in the AML subgroup, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to interrogate outcomes. TP53 was annotated as high-risk (TP53HR) if >1 mutation, one mutation plus allelic deletion or a single mutation with variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥40%; TP53 low-risk (TP53LR) included a single TP53 mutation VAF <40%. Four-hundred and thirteen patients (291 AML, 122 MDS) at a median age of 69.4 years were included, 350 (85%) with TP53HR (253 AML [87%], 97 [79%] MDS). Overall response (OR) rate was 53% in AML and 62% in MDS. OR and composite complete response (CRc) rates was similar in patients with AML irrespective of treatment intensity, but higher when treated with venetoclax. At a median follow-up of 77 months, median OS was superior in patients with MDS than AML (10.8 vs. 5.9 months). On multivariate analysis (MVA) MDS had lower hazards of death compared to AML, as was TP53LR and HSCT. In the AML cohort, TP53LR and HSCT were favorable on MVA, though venetoclax did not improve survival. Both the diagnosis of MDS or AML and burden of TP53 aberrations dictated outcomes in our analysis and HSCT consistently led to improved survival outcomes.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMutationMyelodysplastic SyndromesTumor Suppressor Protein p53AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSulfonamidesBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicSulfonamidesTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53venetoclax

Identifiers

PMID39665206
PMCPMC12130771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.