ArticleHaematologica2025
Cancer-related thrombosis: impact of biological sex on the risk of rethrombosis and bleeding.
Article in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex Differences in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with cancer have a higher risk of re-thrombosis and bleeding secondary to anticoagulant treatment than have individuals without cancer. Given the lack of specific clinical trials, the decision regarding the optimal duration of treatment must consider multiple factors, including sex. The current study used data from the international, prospective TESEO Registry that includes consecutive patients diagnosed with cancer-associated thrombosis. Between July 2018 and December 2022, 2,823 patients were included in the TESEO Registry, 1,351 (48%) of whom were female. The most common venous thromboembolic event (VTE) in both sexes was pulmonary embolism, with an incidence of 58.0% among men and 54.3% in women (P=0.045). After a median follow-up of 6.9 months (interquartile range, 1.9-14.4), the re-thrombosis rate at the end of follow-up was 10.0% in males and 15.0% in females (P=0.14). The location of the primary tumor in the gastrointestinal tract was associated with a greater risk of re-thrombosis, whereas sex had no significant impact. Men had twice as many major bleeds. Additional risk factors for major bleeding included situations of risk due to tumor site or thrombocytopenia, as well as the presence of active tumor bleeding at the time of VTE diagnosis. Overall survival was longer among women. Given the higher incidence of major bleeding among men, sex should be deemed a relevant factor when deciding the duration of anticoagulant treatment in cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.