Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39665107›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

AppleLeafNet: a lightweight and efficient deep learning framework for diagnosing apple leaf diseases.

Muhammad Umair Ali, Majdi Khalid, Majed Farrash, Hassan Fareed M Lahza, Amad Zafar, Seong-Han Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Umair Ali *Department of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Majdi KhalidDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, College of Computing, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Majed FarrashDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, College of Computing, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan Fareed M LahzaDepartment of Cybersecurity, College of Computing, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Amad Zafar *Department of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Han KimDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately identifying apple diseases is essential to control their spread and support the industry. Timely and precise detection is crucial for managing the spread of diseases, thereby improving the production and quality of apples. However, the development of algorithms for analyzing complex leaf images remains a significant challenge. Therefore, in this study, a lightweight deep learning model is designed from scratch to identify the apple leaf condition. The developed framework comprises two stages. First, the designed 37-layer model was employed to assess the condition of apple leaves (healthy or diseased). Second, transfer learning was used for further subclassification of the disease class (e.g., rust, complex, scab, and frogeye leaf spots). The trained lightweight model was reused because the model trained with correlated images facilitated transfer learning for further classification of the disease class. A dataset available online was used to validate the proposed two-stage framework, resulting in a classification rate of 98.25% for apple leaf condition identification and an accuracy of 98.60% for apple leaf disease diagnosis. Furthermore, the results confirm that the proposed model is lightweight and involves relatively fewer learnable parameters in comparison with other pre-trained deep learning models.

Indexed as

apple leaf condition identificationapple leaf disease detectioncrop monitoringdeep learninglightweight model

Identifiers

PMID39665107
PMCPMC11631600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.