Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39665087›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Artificial intelligence-based rapid brain volumetry substantially improves differential diagnosis in dementia.

Jan Rudolph, Johannes Rueckel, Jörg Döpfert, Wen Xin Ling, Jens Opalka, Christian Brem, Nina Hesse, Maria Ingenerf, Vanessa Koliogiannis, Olga Solyanik and 28 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors.

Jan RudolphDepartment of Radiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4849-8034
Johannes RueckelDepartment of Radiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Jörg DöpfertDevelopment Department Mediaire GmbH Berlin Germany.
Wen Xin LingDevelopment Department Mediaire GmbH Berlin Germany.
Jens OpalkaMedical Department Mediaire GmbH Berlin Germany.
Christian BremDepartment of Neuroradiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Nina HesseDepartment of Radiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Maria IngenerfDepartment of Radiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Vanessa KoliogiannisDepartment of Radiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Olga SolyanikDepartment of Radiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Boj F HoppeDepartment of Radiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Hanna ZimmermannDepartment of Neuroradiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Wilhelm FlatzDepartment of Radiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Robert ForbrigDepartment of Neuroradiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Maximilian PatzigDepartment of Neuroradiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Boris-Stephan RauchmannDepartment of Neuroradiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Robert PerneczkyGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Munich Germany.
Oliver PetersGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Berlin Berlin Germany.
Josef PrillerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Berlin Berlin Germany.
Anja SchneiderGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Bonn Bonn Germany.
Klaus FliessbachGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Bonn Bonn Germany.
Andreas HermannGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald Rostock Germany.
Jens WiltfangGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Goettingen Goettingen Germany.
Frank JessenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University Munich Munich Germany.
Emrah DüzelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.
Katharina BuergerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Munich Germany.
Stefan TeipelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock Rostock Germany.
Christoph LaskeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Tuebingen Tuebingen Germany.
Matthis SynofzikGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Tuebingen Tuebingen Germany.
Annika SpottkeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Bonn Bonn Germany.
Michael EwersGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Munich Germany.
Peter DechentMR-Research in Neurosciences, Department of Cognitive Neurology Georg-August-University Goettingen Goettingen Germany.
John-Dylan HaynesBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Germany.
Johannes LevinGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Munich Germany.
Thomas LiebigDepartment of Neuroradiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Michael IngrischDepartment of Radiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Sophia StoeckleinDepartment of Radiology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluates the clinical value of a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) system that performs rapid brain volumetry with automatic lobe segmentation and age- and sex-adjusted percentile comparisons. Methods: Fifty-five patients-17 with Alzheimer's disease (AD), 18 with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and 20 healthy controls-underwent cranial magnetic resonance imaging scans. Two board-certified neuroradiologists (BCNR), two board-certified radiologists (BCR), and three radiology residents (RR) assessed the scans twice: first without AI support and then with AI assistance. Results: AI significantly improved diagnostic accuracy for AD (area under the curve -AI: 0.800, +AI: 0.926, Discussion: AI-assisted volumetry improves diagnostic performance in differentiating AD and FTD, benefiting all reader groups, including BCNR. Highlights: Artificial intelligence (AI)-supported brain volumetry significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), with notable performance gains across radiologists of varying expertise levels.The presented AI tool is readily clinically available and reduces brain volumetry processing time from 12 to 24 hours to under 5 minutes, with full integration into picture archiving and communication systems, streamlining the workflow and facilitating real-time clinical decision making.AI-supported rapid brain volumetry has the potential to improve early diagnosis and to improve patient management.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseartificial intelligencebrain volumetryclinical cohortsfrontotemporal dementia

Identifiers

PMID39665087
PMCPMC11632536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.