ArticleFrontiers in physiology2024
Contactless and continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in a hospital ward: a clinical validation study.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06083272 (VitalThings Guardian Contactless Monitoring), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
VitalThings Guardian Contactless Monitoring
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radar-based inspiratory-to-expiratory time ratio estimation: a validation study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating a ballistocardiography derived respiratory rate algorithm through comprehensive clinical validation across multiple settings.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Early Detection of Respiratory Depression Episodes with the Linshom Continuous Predictive Respiratory Sensor.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Continuous monitoring of respiratory rate in hospital wards can provide early detection of clinical deterioration, thereby reducing mortality, reducing transfers to intensive care units, and reducing the hospital length of stay. Despite the advantages of continuous monitoring, manually counting every 1-12 h remains the standard of care in most hospital wards. The objective of this study was to validate continuous respiratory rate measurements from a radar-based contactless patient monitor [Vitalthings Guardian M10 (Vitalthings AS, Norway)] in a hospital ward. Methods: An observational study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06083272) was conducted at the emergency ward of a university hospital. Adult patients were monitored during rest with Vitalthings Guardian M10 in both a stationary and mobile configuration simultaneously with a reference device [Nox T3s (Nox Medical, Alpharetta, GA, United States)]. The agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical alarms were evaluated using a Clarke Error grid modified for continuous monitoring of respiratory rate. Clinical aspects were further evaluated in terms of trend analysis and examination of gaps between valid measurements. Results: 32 patients were monitored for a median duration of 42 min [IQR (range) 35-46 (30-59 min)]. The bias was 0.1 and 0.0 breaths min Conclusion: Vitalthings Guardian M10 measured respiratory rate accurately and continuously in resting patients in a hospital ward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.