Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39665005›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of plastic surgery2024

Evaluation and Diagnostic-Treatment Approaches of Brachial Plexus Injuries in Adults.

Afsaneh Bagheri, Hossein Akbari, Peyman Akbari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Afsaneh BagheriDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein AkbariDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Peyman AkbariDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brachial plexus injury (BPI), as one of the most devastating injuries in adults, has various negative consequences such as profound functional impairment, debilitating pain, significant mental health consequences, and economic impacts. We aimed to review the evaluation and diagnostic-treatment Approaches of BPI in adults through a review study. Methods: An electronic literature search was completed in Google Scholar, Springer, PubMed, and Science Direct databases from 1980 to 2023. Various keywords related to the purpose such as Brachial plexus, surgical strategy, adult were used. Results: 1.2% of people with multiple traumas had BPIs. BPI is more common in young adult males. For brachial plexus palsy, preoperative evaluation of nerve root avulsion is helpful in surgical planning. . EMG is useful in confirming a diagnosis, localizing the lesion level, estimating the extent of axon loss, and determining whether the lesion is complete. There are different options available for BPI, such as coordinating care, rehabilitation and psychosocial support. In recent times, significant advancements have been made in surgical techniques for nerve repairs. Conclusion: Although it is often not possible to prevent damage to the brachial plexus, it is possible to reduce the risk of further problems after the injury by taking some measures.

Indexed as

AdultBrachial plexusSurgical strategy

Identifiers

PMID39665005
PMCPMC11629760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.