Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664984›Full record

ReviewJournal of hand and microsurgery2025

"Solving vessel caliber mismatch in microvascular anastomosis: A comprehensive review, novel techniques, and a surgical guide for optimal outcomes".

Riccardo Nocini, Valentina Pinto, Luca Contu, Giorgio De Santis, Marco Pignatti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Riccardo NociniEar, Nose and Throat, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Valentina PintoPlastic Surgery, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Luca ContuPlastic Surgery, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Giorgio De SantisPlastic Surgery, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Marco PignattiPlastic Surgery, IRCCS AOU di Bologna, Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caliber mismatch in microvascular anastomosis can significantly increase procedural difficulty and elevate the risk of thrombosis. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify articles addressing surgical techniques for overcoming caliber mismatch in microvascular anastomosis. Various techniques described in the literature were found: modifications of end-to-end anastomosis, the use of end-to-side anastomosis, the application of vessel grafts and the use of vessel couplers. In this review, we critically analyze these techniques and introduce additional technical variations. We discuss the options and express our preferred choice of methods based on specific clinical scenarios: if an alternative vessel (either new or isolated further away) is not found, the severity of the mismatch guides the choice. When less then 1/3 our choice is for vessel dilation and oblique cut of the smaller vessel end (if necessary with the adjunct of a titanium small Ligaclip in an oblique fashion to avoid a cul-de-sac). If caliber mismatch is around or over 1/3, we would prefer an end to side anastomosis.

Indexed as

Caliber discrepancyCaliber mismatchConflict of interest disclosure: no conflict of interestData availability statement: all articles reviewed are available onlineFunding statement: no foundingGuideMicrosurgerySurgical techniqueVascular anastomosis

Identifiers

PMID39664984
PMCPMC11629181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.