Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664966›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2024

Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Propofol Dose and Perioperative Pain During Moderate Sedation-Analgesia for Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Fan Yang, Jie Wang, Huiwen Zhang, Yonghai Zhang, Wanji Yang, Ran Gao, Jingfang Yu, Xuexin Chen, Hanxiang Ma

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Comparison of the EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fan Yang *Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 75004, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1829-5604
Jie Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 75004, People's Republic of China.
Huiwen ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 75004, People's Republic of China.
Yonghai ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 75004, People's Republic of China.
Wanji YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 75004, People's Republic of China.
Ran GaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 75004, People's Republic of China.
Jingfang YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 75004, People's Republic of China.
Xuexin ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 75004, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9996-9847
Hanxiang MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 75004, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8701-9422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In China, the majority of hysteroscopic procedures require moderate sedation and analgesia. The efficacy of intravenous lidocaine in reducing the need for sedatives and alleviating perioperative pain during hysteroscopy remains equivocal. This study aims to determine whether the intravenous administration of lidocaine can reduce the required dose of propofol and enhance perioperative pain management. Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial involving patients with ASA I-II undergoing hysteroscopy. Forty patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either receive an intravenous bolus dose of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion at 4 mg/kg/h until the conclusion of the procedure, or an equivalent volume of normal saline. Propofol was then titrated to maintain a MOAA/S score of ≤ 2. Results: Compared with the control group, the lidocaine group showed a 13.8% decrease in the total dose of propofol (140.0[120.0, 155.0] mg vs 162.5[140.0, 197.5] mg), which was statistically significant ( Conclusion: Intravenous lidocaine reduces the dose requirements of propofol during the induction phase of anesthesia. However, it does not have a significant influence on alleviating intraoperative and postoperative pain during hysteroscopic procedures.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugHysteroscopyLidocainePropofolAdultAnalgesiaAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMiddle AgedPainPostoperative PainProspective StudiesAnesthetics, LocalLidocainePropofolanalgesiahysteroscopylidocainepropofolsedation

Identifiers

PMID39664966
PMCPMC11633289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.