Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664925›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2024

Proximal tibial anatomical axis and anterior tibial cortex-based measurements of posterior tibial slope on lateral radiographs differ least from actual posterior tibial slope-A biomechanical study.

Christian Peez, Caroline Waider, Adrian Deichsel, Thorben Briese, Lucas K Palma Kries, Elmar Herbst, Michael J Raschke, Christoph Kittl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Proximal anatomical axes show bidirectional variability: Accurate tibial slope requires mechanical axis measurement.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian PeezDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery University Hospital Münster Münster Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8055-289X
Caroline WaiderDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery University Hospital Münster Münster Germany.
Adrian DeichselDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery University Hospital Münster Münster Germany.
Thorben BrieseDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery University Hospital Münster Münster Germany.
Lucas K Palma KriesDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery University Hospital Münster Münster Germany.
Elmar HerbstDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery University Hospital Münster Münster Germany.
Michael J RaschkeDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery University Hospital Münster Münster Germany.
Christoph KittlDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery University Hospital Münster Münster Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare different measurement techniques of the posterior tibial slope (PTS) on lateral radiographs with the actual in situ PTS and evaluate the effect of tibial malrotation and image section length. Methods: Actual PTS was measured on eight fresh-frozen tibiae using a portable 6-axis measuring arm with an accuracy of ±0.01°. True lateral radiographs were taken in the neutral position and after applying 10/20/30° internal/external rotation (IR/ER) and 5/10/15° varus/valgus rotation. The PTS was measured radiographically using five different reference axes: anterior tibial cortex (ATC), anatomical tibial axis, proximal tibial anatomical axis (PTAA), posterior tibial cortex (PTC) and fibular shaft axis (FSA). Results: The ATC and PTAA methods showed the lowest deviation from the actual PTS, while the PTC method showed the highest difference of 5.5 ± 1.5° (medial) and 7.1 ± 1.8° (lateral) among all tested methods ( Conclusion: Tibial slope measurements have a high degree of variability between different measurement methods, while the ATC and PTAA methods showed the least deviation from the actual PTS measured in this in vitro model. Malrotation resulted in a severe distortion of the PTS values, which may alter preoperative planning and intraoperative results. Therefore, radiographic PTS measurements may be contrasted with more objective, reproducible and reliable measuring methods. Level of Evidence: There is no level of evidence as this study was an experimental laboratory study.

Indexed as

biomechanicsmeasuring techniquesposterior tibial sloperadiographs

Identifiers

PMID39664925
PMCPMC11632255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.