ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Validation of a web-based dietary assessment program against 24-h recalls in adults with type 1 diabetes.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nutrition Data is a web-based program for nutrition analysis and registration of diet and exercise. It may aid dietary assessment and carbohydrate counting in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) but requires validation. Objectives: To assess relative validity of Nutrition Data in measuring energy, carbohydrate and other macronutrient intake and evaluate the program's user acceptability, in adults with T1D. Methods: In this validation study, we analyzed data from 42 participants (median age 46.5 years, 45% women) from the DANCE study, a randomized controlled trial comprising of individuals with T1D in Sweden. Mean intakes of energy, carbohydrates, fat, protein, alcohol, fiber, sugars and saturated fat from 2 days registered in Nutrition Data were compared against the respective intakes acquired by unannounced 24-h-recalls of the same days. Paired sample Results: There were no significant differences in mean dietary intakes between the two methods. Spearman's correlation coefficients ranged from Conclusion: The web-based program Nutrition Data showed good validity in assessing intake of energy and macronutrients compared to 24-h recalls and high user acceptability in Swedish men and women with T1D, and could, therefore, be used to facilitate diet registration and carbohydrate counting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.