Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664861›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2024

wQFM-DISCO: DISCO-enabled wQFM improves phylogenomic analyses despite the presence of paralogs.

Sheikh Azizul Hakim, Md Rownok Zahan Ratul, Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sheikh Azizul HakimDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka 1205, Bangladesh.
Md Rownok Zahan RatulDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka 1205, Bangladesh.
Md Shamsuzzoha BayzidDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka 1205, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5640-0615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Gene trees often differ from the species trees that contain them due to various factors, including incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and gene duplication and loss (GDL). Several highly accurate species tree estimation methods have been introduced to explicitly address ILS, including ASTRAL, a widely used statistically consistent method, and wQFM, a quartet amalgamation approach experimentally shown to be more accurate than ASTRAL. Two recent advancements, ASTRAL-Pro and DISCO, have emerged in phylogenomics to consider GDL. ASTRAL-Pro introduces a refined quartet similarity measure, accounting for orthology and paralogy. On the other hand, DISCO offers a general strategy to decompose multi-copy gene trees into a collection of single-copy trees, allowing the utilization of methods previously designed for species tree inference in the context of single-copy gene trees. Results: In this study, we first introduce some variants of DISCO to examine its underlying hypotheses and present analytical results on the statistical guarantees of DISCO. In particular, we introduce DISCO-R, a variant of DISCO with a refined and improved pruning strategy that provides more accurate and robust results. We then demonstrate with extensive evaluation studies on a collection of simulated and real data sets that wQFM paired with DISCO variants consistently matches or outperforms ASTRAL-Pro and other competing methods. Availability and implementation: DISCO-R and other variants are freely available at https://github.com/skhakim/DISCO-variants.

Identifiers

PMID39664861
PMCPMC11634537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.