ArticleChemical science2025
Assessment of fine-tuned large language models for real-world chemistry and material science applications.
Article in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automating Chemical Reasoning in High-Throughput Phase Identification With a Probabilistic, LLM-Guided Framework.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Porous Organic Polymers: From Molecular Design to Scalable Technologies.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- BB-EIT: A Generalized Prediction Model for Protein Adsorption on Polymer Brushes Using Augmented Chemical Embeddings.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Sustainable Materials Design With Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Can You Help ChatGPT Get an "A" in Organic Chemistry? Teaching Effective Prompting of Large Language Models for Reaction Prediction.Journal of chemical education · 2026Article
- A survey on large language models in biology and chemistry.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Boosting Computational Catalysis and Chemical Reactivity with Artificial Intelligence.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Review
- General-Purpose Models for the Chemical Sciences: LLMs and Beyond.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Application and Prospects of Large Language Models in Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Cartesian equivariant representations for learning and understanding molecular orbitals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Experimental Validation of Modeling Approaches Describing the Crystallization of Pure Triacylglycerides and Their Mixtures: A Review.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Paradigms for Next-Generation Metal-Organic Framework Research.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Review
- Exploring the chemical design space of metal-organic frameworks for photocatalysis.Chemical science · 2025Article
- Explainable Synthesizability Prediction of Inorganic Crystal Polymorphs Using Large Language Models.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- A Perspective on Foundation Models in Chemistry.JACS Au · 2025Review
- Neural networks and foundation models: two strategies for EEG-to-fMRI prediction.Frontiers in systems biology · 2025Article
- Advancing plant metabolic research by using large language models to expand databases and extract labeled data.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
50 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current generation of large language models (LLMs) has limited chemical knowledge. Recently, it has been shown that these LLMs can learn and predict chemical properties through fine-tuning. Using natural language to train machine learning models opens doors to a wider chemical audience, as field-specific featurization techniques can be omitted. In this work, we explore the potential and limitations of this approach. We studied the performance of fine-tuning three open-source LLMs (GPT-J-6B, Llama-3.1-8B, and Mistral-7B) for a range of different chemical questions. We benchmark their performances against "traditional" machine learning models and find that, in most cases, the fine-tuning approach is superior for a simple classification problem. Depending on the size of the dataset and the type of questions, we also successfully address more sophisticated problems. The most important conclusions of this work are that, for all datasets considered, their conversion into an LLM fine-tuning training set is straightforward and that fine-tuning with even relatively small datasets leads to predictive models. These results suggest that the systematic use of LLMs to guide experiments and simulations will be a powerful technique in any research study, significantly reducing unnecessary experiments or computations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.