ArticleFrontiers in radiology2024
Language task-based fMRI analysis using machine learning and deep learning.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Naturalistic fMRI Language Mapping With Rotation Forest.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Persian Paradigm for Language Cortical Mapping: Development, Feasibility, and Evaluation.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- A Rapid fMRI Paradigm for Localisation of the Language Network.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Decision Support Systems in Neurosurgery: Current Applications and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Task-based language fMRI is a non-invasive method of identifying brain regions subserving language that is used to plan neurosurgical resections which potentially encroach on eloquent regions. The use of unstructured fMRI paradigms, such as naturalistic fMRI, to map language is of increasing interest. Their analysis necessitates the use of alternative methods such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) because task regressors may be difficult to define in these paradigms. Methods: Using task-based language fMRI as a starting point, this study investigates the use of different categories of ML and DL algorithms to identify brain regions subserving language. Data comprising of seven task-based language fMRI paradigms were collected from 26 individuals, and ML and DL models were trained to classify voxel-wise fMRI time series. Results: The general machine learning and the interval-based methods were the most promising in identifying language areas using fMRI time series classification. The geneal machine learning method achieved a mean whole-brain Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) of Discussion: This study demonstrates the utility of different ML and DL methods in classifying task-based language fMRI time series. A potential application of these methods is the identification of language activation from unstructured paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.