ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Intraocular Foreign Bodies from a Tertiary Eye Center in North China.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term visual acuity outcomes and prognostic factors following 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for intraocular foreign body extraction.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Analysis of Perforating Globe Injuries with Intraorbital Foreign Bodies: An 18-Year Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to describe the epidemiology and clinical features of patients with intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) and analyze the prognostic factors influencing final vision. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with IOFBs admitted to Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2021. Inclusion criteria involved complete clinical data details of patients diagnosed with intraocular foreign bodies in our hospital who were treated with concurrent surgery and based on IOFB position and characteristics, different surgical methods were employed. The minimum follow-up duration was 6 months. Exclusion criteria were foreign bodies retained in the orbit, organ failure, surgical contraindications, coagulation abnormalities, autoimmune diseases, history of ocular surgery, and ocular space-occupying lesions. Based on IOFB position and characteristics, different surgical methods were employed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to predict independent factors influencing final visual acuity after IOFBs. Results: This study analyzed 159 patients (159 eyes) with IOFBs. Based on discharge and follow-up results, IOFB removal was performed through pars plana incision in 105 (67.9%) eyes, corneoscleral limbus incision in 24 (15.1%) eyes, and original wound in 27 (17.0%) eyes. Of these, 44 eyes underwent IOFB removal without vitrectomy, while 55 (34.6%) eyes were treated with silicone oil. Post-vitrectomy, three cases showed secondary macular membrane, five cases exhibited retinal detachment, and enucleation was necessary in three cases. The final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR) was 1.06 ±0.88, significantly better than preoperative visual acuity of 1.65 ±0.87 (t = 8.21, p < 0.01). Multi-factor logistic regression analysis revealed that the length of corneal/scleral wound (OR=0.6 P < 0.05), maximum size of IOFB (OR=0.585 P < 0.05), initial presenting VA (OR=0.900 P < 0.05), and macular lesions(OR=0.400 P < 0.05) were risk factors for postoperative vision prognosis after intraocular foreign body surgery. Conclusion: In a tertiary eye center in northern China, IOFBs predominantly affected the working-age group, particularly males. Factors such as wound length, IOFB size, initial presenting VA, and macular lesions might impact the final visual outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.