Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664783›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Intraocular Foreign Bodies from a Tertiary Eye Center in North China.

Xiaoli Xing, Fang Liu, Yan Qi, Jun Li, Bin Yu, Lei Wan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoli XingEye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, QingDao, People's Republic of China.
Fang LiuEye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, QingDao, People's Republic of China.
Yan QiEye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, QingDao, People's Republic of China.
Jun LiEye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, QingDao, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9121-6162
Bin YuEye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, QingDao, People's Republic of China.
Lei WanEye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, QingDao, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aims to describe the epidemiology and clinical features of patients with intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) and analyze the prognostic factors influencing final vision. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with IOFBs admitted to Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2021. Inclusion criteria involved complete clinical data details of patients diagnosed with intraocular foreign bodies in our hospital who were treated with concurrent surgery and based on IOFB position and characteristics, different surgical methods were employed. The minimum follow-up duration was 6 months. Exclusion criteria were foreign bodies retained in the orbit, organ failure, surgical contraindications, coagulation abnormalities, autoimmune diseases, history of ocular surgery, and ocular space-occupying lesions. Based on IOFB position and characteristics, different surgical methods were employed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to predict independent factors influencing final visual acuity after IOFBs. Results: This study analyzed 159 patients (159 eyes) with IOFBs. Based on discharge and follow-up results, IOFB removal was performed through pars plana incision in 105 (67.9%) eyes, corneoscleral limbus incision in 24 (15.1%) eyes, and original wound in 27 (17.0%) eyes. Of these, 44 eyes underwent IOFB removal without vitrectomy, while 55 (34.6%) eyes were treated with silicone oil. Post-vitrectomy, three cases showed secondary macular membrane, five cases exhibited retinal detachment, and enucleation was necessary in three cases. The final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR) was 1.06 ±0.88, significantly better than preoperative visual acuity of 1.65 ±0.87 (t = 8.21, p < 0.01). Multi-factor logistic regression analysis revealed that the length of corneal/scleral wound (OR=0.6 P < 0.05), maximum size of IOFB (OR=0.585 P < 0.05), initial presenting VA (OR=0.900 P < 0.05), and macular lesions(OR=0.400 P < 0.05) were risk factors for postoperative vision prognosis after intraocular foreign body surgery. Conclusion: In a tertiary eye center in northern China, IOFBs predominantly affected the working-age group, particularly males. Factors such as wound length, IOFB size, initial presenting VA, and macular lesions might impact the final visual outcome.

Indexed as

intraocular foreign bodiesprognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID39664783
PMCPMC11633304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.