Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664765›Full record

ArticleThe Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society2024

Nutrition support practices in the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Ghana.

E K Anku, L O Samad, G Akafity, S A Amoo, L T Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enteral feeding barriers in the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Ghana.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Making sense of the outcome of a rehabilitation implementation trial in the intensive care unit: Mixed methods.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Relevance and application of clinical practice guidelines in different settings.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E K AnkuDepartment of Dietherapy and Nutrition, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-7248
L O SamadDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8801-3233
G AkafityDepartment of Research, Monitoring and Evaluation, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4511-5971
S A AmooDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-7301
L T HillCritical Point Critical Care Nutrition Consultancy, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0228-8907

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nutrition support is recognised as an important therapy for attenuating the catabolic effects of critical illnesses, including malnutrition prevention. However, variations in nutrition support practices make it difficult to achieve optimal outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). Objectives: To explore current nutrition support practices among healthcare professionals (doctors and nurses) in the ICU of a tertiary hospital in Ghana. Methods: Via a cross-sectional survey, the nutrition support practices and self-reported skills of 30 ICU healthcare professionals (23 nurses and 7 doctors) providing nutrition support were explored. Results are presented as themes with frequencies and proportions. Categorical data were analysed using Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Most of the respondents were young and had limited ICU experience. Almost half of the respondents were unaware of or were not familiar with the content of an in-house feeding protocol for both enteral nutrition (EN) and parenteral nutrition support, despite a majority reporting the feeding protocol as the main source of nutrition support information. There was a general lack of standardisation of execution of most nutrition support practices, especially with the pattern of EN delivery, usual method of optimising EN, and gastric residual volume threshold used to guide practice. Most respondents self-reported being average/satisfactory in the management of nutrition support. Conclusion: The study revealed that healthcare professionals in our ICU had varying nutrition support practices and competencies. There is a need for standardised and practical feeding protocols in accessible formats, ongoing education, and training in nutrition support to improve nutrition support practices and competencies of healthcare professionals providing nutrition support in the ICU setting. Contribution of the study: This study is the first to describe challenges of nutrition support practices in an intensive care unit (ICU) in Ghana and is among limited data on this topic from African countries. This study has provided important insights into both the needs and opportunities for enhancing clinical nutrition skills and knowledge, and the practical application of such improved knowledge. As such, these data are important for local quality improvement for both clinical care of ICU patients and for professional development of healthcare personnel in resource-constrained hospital settings.

Indexed as

enteral nutritionICU nutritionnutrition protocolsNutrition support practicesparenteral nutrition

Identifiers

PMID39664765
PMCPMC11633648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.