ArticleAddiction neuroscience2024
Perirhinal cortex to the nucleus accumbens circuit in novelty salience following methamphetamine self-administration.
Article in Addiction neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methamphetamine (meth) use disorder is part of an overarching use disorder that encompasses continued drug seeking and an increased risk of returning to drug use following periods of abstaining. Chronic meth use results in drug-induced cortical plasticity in the perirhinal cortex (PRC) that mediates responses to novelty. PRH projection targets are numerous and include the nucleus accumbens core (NAc). Whereas the PRH-prefrontal cortex is involved in object recognition; we propose that the PRH-NAc is involved in novelty salience. Rats underwent short-access (ShA, 1 hr) or long-access (LgA, 6 hr) meth self-administration (SA). We then used a dual viral strategy to inhibit or activate PRH-NAc during a novel cue test in which rats were presented with meth-associated and novel levers. Response patterns on these levers differ depending on the meth access protocol: ShA meth SA results in equal responding on both novel- and meth-associated levers, whereas LgA meth results in perseverative responding on the meth-associated lever. Inactivation of the PRH-NAc increased responding on the meth lever relative to the novel lever, resulting in a LgA behavioral phenotype. In contrast, activation in LgA rats was without a behavioral effect. We also report that male LgA sucrose SA animals perseverated on the novel lever rather than the meth-associated lever, which contrast their meth SA counter parts and female specific patterns of behavior. These data open a new line of interest in the role of the PRH-NAc circuit in novelty salience through identification of the behavioral relevance of this circuit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.