Duration of In-patient Physical Therapy at a Tertiary Hospital: Implications of a Time and Motion Study.

Background and Objectives: Inpatient physical therapy (PT) care entails careful provision of service for individuals across a spectrum of disorders needing evidence-based physical rehabilitation during their hospital admission. The main difficulty is identifying adequate time allocation for safe patient service within an eight-hour working time frame. At a selected tertiary teaching government-run hospital, an arbitrary personnel-population ratio method is used for human resource allocation which may lead to issues in service delivery and healthcare workforce wellness. Apart from patient care, physical therapists also assume non-clinical roles revolving on administration, clinical education, and research. This highlights the importance of identifying the duration of tasks to assess work efficiency and manage time constraints posed by the limitations of the work shift. Practice guidelines may help improve staff workload scheduling, however, there is a lack of available guidelines regarding physical therapy practice in the hospital or acute care setting for developing countries. The purpose of this study was to determine the duration of care for inpatients with musculoskeletal and neurological conditions and administrative tasks, and to determine the relationship of duration of care with months of experience. Methods: A continuous observation time motion study of a typical workday of all physical therapists in an in-patient setting of a tertiary teaching hospital was conducted. An external observer will time the tasks done by the PT. The external observer kept distance from the direct patient encounter to minimize interference that may affect timing. Patients with conditions of different etiologies and functional levels were included. Results: Nineteen physical therapists with a mean experience of 54.63 months were observed. There were no adverse events during the implementation of this study. The total mean time in minutes of management of neurological patients is 37:32, and musculoskeletal patients is 28:30. Time for administrative tasks took an average of 20:33 minutes. There was also a low positive correlation on months of experience and treatment duration for patients with neurologic conditions (p=0.0471). Results showed that the allocated treatment duration is determined to be sufficient for performing PT activities. The optimal number of patients to be decked can also be appropriately determined to optimize resource allocation. Conclusion: Our pilot study attempted to quantify the duration of PT care in an inpatient setting that caters to patients with different diagnosis and varying needs for PT management. Although descriptive statistics and a weak to insignificant correlation was seen in most of the variables, there may be some benefit in gathering more duration data across different acute care settings within the country. Our pilot time and motion study can contribute to the limited evidence of duration of inpatient care that may inform human resource allocation, deliverables prioritization, and employee wellness and development. Figures have been presented which could be the basis for future policy research for management science and resource allocation studies.