ArticleOncology letters2025
A novel algorithm for the detection of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer using next‑generation sequencing data.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The molecular-based detection of microsatellite instability (MSI) in endometrial cancer is complex, due to the low sensitivity of PCR and a lack of standardization in next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods. In the present study, sequenced data were obtained from an NGS panel following the addition of five commonly used microsatellite loci. Subsequently, a novel algorithm, namely MSIPeak, was developed for data analysis. Results of the present study demonstrated that MSI data obtained using MSIPeak were presented in a peak, using a threshold of 1.10 to distinguish stable and unstable loci. MSIPeak was further validated using synthetic DNA samples and endometrial cancer tissue and the results were compared with the immunohistochemical analysis-determined mismatch repair status. The PCR results demonstrated a 3-base-pair (bp) deletion in synthetic DNA samples, compared with 1- and 2-bp deletion controls. Results obtained using MSIPeak demonstrated notable differences in peak profiles and positive scores in synthetic DNA samples with 1-, 2- and 3-bp deletions, compared with controls. Thus, the results of the present study demonstrated that NGS-based MSI detection exhibited a higher sensitivity compared with PCR. In addition, NGS-based MSI detection exhibited higher levels of repeatability and applicability compared with other MSI-NGS-based methods, such as MSISensor2 and MANTIS. Collectively, the results of the present study highlighted that the combination of MSIPeak and NGS exhibits potential in the detection of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.