ArticleOncology letters2025
Diagnostic value of mammography combined with ultrasound shear wave elastography and magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Ultrasound Elastography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Article
- A Dual-Transducer Approach for High-Resolution and High-Precision Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies affecting women worldwide, and an early diagnosis is critical for improving prognosis. The present study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of mammography (MG) combined with ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the early screening of breast cancer. Patients with breast tumors who underwent lumpectomy at a single hospital between December 2021 and January 2023 were selected and categorized into a benign or malignant group based on pathological findings. All patients had undergone examinations with MG, SWE and MRI. Imaging parameters were subsequently compared between the two groups. A total of 93 patients with breast tumors were included in the study, comprising 37 individuals in the benign group and 56 in the malignant group. MG findings revealed that patients in the malignant group exhibited significantly higher incidences of high breast glandular density, irregular mass margins, unclear mass borders and axillary lymph node involvement compared with those in the benign group. SWE results indicated that the elasticity ratio of the lesion to fat, and the mean and maximum values of the elastic modulus were significantly lower in the benign group than in the malignant group. Additionally, MRI findings demonstrated that the MRI-measured maximum diameter was larger, and the prevalence of irregular lesion morphology, irregular mass margins, signal enhancement and type III time-signal intensity curves was greater in the malignant group compared with the benign group. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MG + SWE + MRI were 94.6, 86.5, 91.4 and 91.4%, respectively. Furthermore, the diagnostic efficacy of this combination surpassed that of MG + SWE, MG + MRI and SWE + MRI (area under the curve, 0.906 vs. 0.767, 0.758 and 0.763, respectively). In conclusion, the combination of MG with SWE and MRI exhibits a superior performance in the early diagnosis of breast cancer, exhibiting higher diagnostic accuracy and reliability compared with pairwise combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.