ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Predicting place of delivery choice among childbearing women in East Africa: a comparative analysis of advanced machine learning techniques.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying Predictors of Utilization of Skilled Birth Attendance in Uganda Through Interpretable Machine Learning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Predicting stillbirth and identifying key maternal risk factors using machine learning.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sub-Saharan Africa faces high neonatal and maternal mortality rates due to limited access to skilled healthcare during delivery. This study aims to improve the classification of health facilities and home deliveries using advanced machine learning techniques and to explore factors influencing women's choices of delivery locations in East Africa. Method: The study focused on 86,009 childbearing women in East Africa. A comparative analysis of 12 advanced machine learning algorithms was conducted, utilizing various data balancing techniques and hyperparameter optimization methods to enhance model performance. Result: The prevalence of health facility delivery in East Africa was found to be 83.71%. The findings showed that the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm and CatBoost performed best in predicting the place of delivery, in which both of those algorithms scored an accuracy of 95% and an AUC of 0.98 after optimized with Bayesian optimization tuning and insignificant difference between them in all comprehensive analysis of metrics performance. Factors associated with facility-based deliveries were identified using association rule mining, including parental education levels, timing of initial antenatal care (ANC) check-ups, wealth status, marital status, mobile phone ownership, religious affiliation, media accessibility, and birth order. Conclusion: This study underscores the vital role of machine learning algorithms in predicting health facility deliveries. A slight decline in facility deliveries from previous reports highlights the urgent need for targeted interventions to meet Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly in maternal health. The study recommends promoting facility-based deliveries. These include raising awareness about skilled birth attendance, encouraging early ANC check-up, addressing financial barriers through targeted support programs, implementing culturally sensitive interventions, utilizing media campaigns, and mobile health initiatives. Design specific interventions tailored to the birth order of the child, recognizing that mothers may have different informational needs depending on whether it is their first or subsequent delivery. Furthermore, we recommended researchers to explore a variety of techniques and validate findings using more recent data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.