Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664532›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Screening for frequent hospitalization risk among community-dwelling older adult between 2016 and 2023: machine learning-driven item selection, scoring system development, and prospective validation.

Eman Leung, Jingjing Guan, Qingpeng Zhang, Chun Cheung Ching, Hiliary Yee, Yilin Liu, Hang Sau Ng, Richard Xu, Hector Wing Hong Tsang, Albert Lee and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eman Leung *Department of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jingjing Guan *JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China.
Qingpeng ZhangDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, HKU Musketeers Foundation Institute of Data Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, China.
Chun Cheung ChingJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China.
Hiliary YeeDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yilin LiuJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China.
Hang Sau NgPeople Service Centre, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Richard XuDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Hector Wing Hong TsangDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Albert LeeJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China.
Frank Youhua ChenDepartment of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Screening for frequent hospitalizations in the community can help prevent super-utilizers from growing in the inpatient population. However, the determinants of frequent hospitalizations have not been systematically examined, their operational definitions have been inconsistent, and screening among community members lacks tools. Nor do we know if what determined frequent hospitalizations before COVID-19 continued to be the determinant of frequent hospitalizations at the height of the pandemic. Hence, the current study aims to identify determinants of frequent hospitalization and their screening items developed from the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), as our 273-item CGA is too lengthy to administer in full in community or primary care settings. The stability of the identified determinants will be examined in terms of the prospective validity of pre-COVID-selected items administered at the height of the pandemic. Methods: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments (CGAs) were administered between 2016 and 2018 in the homes of 1,611 older adults aged 65+ years. Learning models were deployed to select CGA items to maximize the classification of different operational definitions of frequent hospitalizations, ranging from the most inclusive definition, wherein two or more hospitalizations over 2 years, to the most exclusive, wherein two or more hospitalizations must appear during year two, reflecting different care needs. In addition, the CGA items selected by the best-performing learning model were then developed into a random-forest-based scoring system for assessing frequent hospitalization risk, the validity of which was tested during 2018 and again prospectively between 2022 and 2023 in a sample of 329 older adults recruited from a district adjacent to where the CGAs were initially performed. Results: Seventeen items were selected from the CGA by our best-performing algorithm (DeepBoost), achieving 0.90 AUC in classifying operational definitions of frequent hospitalizations differing in temporal distributions and care needs. The number of medications prescribed and the need for assistance with emptying the bowel, housekeeping, transportation, and laundry were selected using the DeepBoost algorithm under the supervision of all operational definitions of frequent hospitalizations. On the other hand, reliance on walking aids, ability to balance on one's own, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and usage of social services were selected in the top 10 by all but the operational definitions that reflect the greatest care needs. The prospective validation of the original risk-scoring system using a sample recruited from a different district during the COVID-19 pandemic achieved an AUC of 0.82 in differentiating those rehospitalized twice or more over 2 years from those who were not. Conclusion: A small subset of CGA items representing one's independence in aspects of (instrumental) activities of daily living, mobility, history of COPD, and social service utilization are sufficient for community members at risk of frequent hospitalization. The determinants of frequent hospitalization represented by the subset of CGA items remain relevant over the course of COVID-19 pandemic and across sociogeography.

Indexed as

COVID-19Geriatric AssessmentHospitalizationIndependent LivingMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningProspective StudiesRisk Assessmentartificial intelligence: machine learning and deep learningCOVID-19data sciencehealth risk assessmentpatient readmissionpublic health: preventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID39664532
PMCPMC11632619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.