Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664509›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

From Theory to Action: Evaluation of a Longitudinal Project-Based Antiracism Course for Post-Graduate Physicians.

Camila M Mateo, Danny McCormick, Chrissie Connors, Gaurab Basu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camila M MateoDivision of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Danny McCormickHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Chrissie ConnorsCenter for Health Equity Education and Advocacy, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Gaurab BasuHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Few opportunities exist for postgraduate physicians to learn to address racism in their professional practice. We created a virtual, 5-session antiracism course that included the development of a formal action project to address racism at participants' home institution. Methods: We delivered this curriculum virtually to 2 cohorts (2021 and 2022) of postgraduate physicians, nationally. The curriculum had 3 educational aims: (1) to increase knowledge on antiracism, (2) to increase comfort and engagement in discussing antiracism at home institutions, and (3) to increase self-efficacy to execute an institution-based project. Theory-informed practice, community building, and project-based learning were used to achieve our educational aims. We analyzed changes in these domains in addressing racism using matched 7-item Likert-scale questions from pre- and post-course surveys and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. We assessed perceptions and impacts of the course with post-course survey items using descriptive statistics. Results: Forty-three of 50 participants (86%) who completed pre- and post-course surveys were included in the analysis. We found pre-post course increases in mean scores (converted from Likert scales), for all 15 paired questions. For example, we found improvements in understanding the historical context of racism in medical institutions (mean score change: 5.12 [SD 1.00] to 6.42 [SD 0.76], Conclusion: This project-based antiracism course for postgraduate learners increased self-reported knowledge of, comfort with, and self-efficacy in addressing racism and was well received by participants.

Indexed as

anti-racismhealth equitymedical education

Identifiers

PMID39664509
PMCPMC11632890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.