Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664508›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2024

Teaching Procedural Skills: Integrating Educational Theory Into Practice.

Christopher J Smith, Cory Rohlfsen, Jana Wardian, Khalid Sahak

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07530822 (The Effect Of Prenatal Care Training Using The Peyton Model On Midwifery Students' Knowledge, Skills, Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, And Satisfaction Levels), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07530822 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect Of Prenatal Care Training Using The Peyton Model On Midwifery Students' Knowledge, Skills, Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, And Satisfaction Levels

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2025 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsPrenatal Care, Midwifery Education, Clinical Self-Efficacy, AnxietyArmsPeyton Model Training, Standard Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher J SmithAssociate Professor, Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0001-6417-0824
Cory RohlfsenAssistant Professor, Divisions of Hospital Medicine and General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center.
Jana WardianAssociate Professor, Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center.
Khalid SahakAssistant Professor, Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Teaching procedural skills is an essential part of health professions education, yet formal training is often lacking from traditional curricula. Methods: A workshop on teaching procedural skills was developed as part of a clinician educator track at a large health professions university. Participants included medical residents and fellows (postgraduate years 2-6) from various training programs. The 90-minute, interactive training integrated Gagne's model of instructional design with evidence-based teaching practices. Workshop outcomes were evaluated with pre- and postworkshop surveys. Learner reactions (Kirkpatrick level 1) were assessed via course evaluation. Learning and behavior (Kirkpatrick level 2) were evaluated via attitudinal and knowledge-based questions. Data were collected from three cohorts of participants (2022-2024). Responses were analyzed by paired Results: Residents and fellows from 11 different disciplines participated in the workshops. The survey response rate was 30 out of 35 (86%). Course evaluations were positive for all six questions (mean scores: 4.8-5.0 on a 5-point Likert scale [1 = Discussion: A workshop focused on evidence-based teaching of procedural skills was well reviewed and improved participants' attitudes and knowledge. Strengths of the workshop include its appeal to a broad range of medical trainees, integration of educational theory, and interactive design.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumTeachingEducationHumansInternship and ResidencySurveys and QuestionnairesClinical/Procedural Skills TrainingClinical Teaching/Bedside TeachingEducational TheoryInstructional DesignProcedural Skills

Identifiers

PMID39664508
PMCPMC11632081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.