ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024
Low birthweight rate differences associated with distinct perinatal staffing mixes at federally funded health centers.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health workforce issues and challenges in the post-pandemic era.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Career Pathways and Employment Experiences of Certified Nurse-Midwives Compared With Other Advanced Practice Registered Nurses in the United States.Journal of midwifery & women's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health centers (sometimes referred to as "federally qualified health centers") can play an important role in addressing perinatal inequities. However, there is limited information on how different staffing models in health centers contribute to perinatal outcomes, including the availability of certified nurse midwives (CNMs). Using 2011-2021 Uniform Data System files, we examined 4 staffing models in 1385 health centers: those with no CNMs or obstetricians-gynecologists (OBs) ("non-CNM/OB"), CNM-only, OB-only, and both CNMs and OBs ("CNM/OB"). We predicted adjusted low birthweight (LBW) rates across these staffing types using a generalized linear model approach, adjusting for both time and center fixed effects as well as relevant patient, staffing, organizational, and community characteristics. We found that CNM-only health centers had the lowest LBW rates across all staffing models (7.6%) and non-CNM/OB centers had the highest (10.1%). Among Black births, LBW rates ranged from 10.1% (CNM-only) to 13.5% (non-CNM/OB). Findings indicate the importance of building and supporting the CNM workforce and ensuring adequate staffing at health centers, particularly as part of a comprehensive approach to addressing inequities in perinatal outcomes including addressing the scope of practice of CNMs, as more CNM-staff health centers were in areas with independent scope of practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.