Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39664461›Full record

ArticleTransfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie2024

Platelet Additive Solutions SSP+ and T-PAS+ Are Interchangeable for Platelet Concentrate Storage despite Differences in Composition and Plasticizer.

Britt Van Aelst, Karen Bens, Bea Sabot, Sarah Vertongen, Hendrik B Feys, Veerle Compernolle, Katrijn R Six

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Britt Van AelstBlood Services, Belgian Red Cross Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium.
Karen BensBlood Services, Belgian Red Cross Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium.
Bea SabotBlood Services, Belgian Red Cross Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium.
Sarah VertongenTransfusion Research Center, Belgian Red Cross Flanders, Ghent, Belgium.
Hendrik B FeysTransfusion Research Center, Belgian Red Cross Flanders, Ghent, Belgium.
Veerle CompernolleBlood Services, Belgian Red Cross Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium.
Katrijn R SixTransfusion Research Center, Belgian Red Cross Flanders, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Platelet additive solutions support ex vivo storage of platelet concentrates used for transfusion. The composition of platelet additive solutions within one generation (i.e., PAS-E) is similar but not identical. Additionally, the platelet additive solution storage bag may contain different plasticizers. This study compares the effect of two PAS-E solutions (SSP+ vs. T-PAS+, stored in a DEHP-containing and DEHP-free bag, respectively) to investigate if both additive solutions are interchangeable for platelet concentrate storage. Methods: Platelet concentrates stored in plasma supplemented with SSP+ or T-PAS+ were compared by using a pool-and-split design. Platelet metabolism was investigated using a blood gas analyzer. The degree of platelet storage lesion was determined by flow cytometry to measure granule release and phosphatidylserine scrambling. Results: The quality of platelet concentrates stored in either SSP+ or T-PAS+ is acceptable as pH decreased only slightly as a function of time. PH remained above 7.2 on exiration day +1 (day 6), which is far above the minimal criterion of 6.4. Platelet storage lesion was comparable between the two study groups with only limited α-granule release and phosphatidylserine surface expression in both groups after storage for 5 days, Conclusion: This study supports a safe switch between SSP+ and T-PAS+ storage solutions for platelet concentrates despite slight differences in storage solution composition and DEHP content.

Identifiers

PMID39664461
PMCPMC11630905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.